Tuition Sees 4 Percent Hike for 2016-17
$1,920 increase brings tuition to $49,968

ILLUSTRATION BY JESUS RODRIGUEZ/THE HOYA Tuition will rise four percent beginning this fall semester from $48,048 to $49,968, contributing to a 18 percent hike in tuition since 2012.

ILLUSTRATION BY JESUS RODRIGUEZ/THE HOYA
Tuition will rise four percent beginning this fall semester from $48,048 to $49,968, contributing to an 18 percent hike in tuition since 2012.

Tuition will rise 4 percent beginning this fall semester from $48,048 to $49,968, an increase which is being accompanied by the largest investment in financial aid in the university’s history, according to the Georgetown’s financial plan for fiscal years 2017 to 2020.

The $1,920 tuition increase puts the total cost of attendance – including room and board – at around $70,140 for continuing students for the 2016-17 academic year.

Tuition rates grew at a slower rate than last year’s 4.3 percent hike, and are anticipated to grow at a steady 4 percent for the next four years.

The financial plan, which was published by the Division of Financial Affairs on Jan. 27 and announced Feb. 16, lays out the university’s projected financial growth and estimates sources of income and anticipated expenditures.

The plan states that the university will dedicate $177 million to financial aid, an 8 percent increase from last year’s $166.6 million. Funding for scholarships will increase by $4.5 million in fiscal year 2017, $6.9 million in fiscal year 2018, $4.8 million in fiscal year 2019 and $6.8 million in fiscal year 2020.

The plan acknowledges the effect of the current national economic environment on projections for campus revenue and balances spending with a combination of increased tuition rates, graduate student enrollment and current-use gifts — donations that can be spent at the discretion of the university.

Georgetown’s increase is part of a larger national trend of steepening college tuition. Harvard University increased its tuition by 3.9 percent this year from $41,362 to $43,280, while Yale University increased its tuition by 3.9 percent from $47,600 to $49, 480. Tuition for out-of-state students at the University of Virginia increased by 3 percent from ­$40,506 to $41,722 this year.

Vice President for Finance and University Treasurer David Rubenstein said the tuition increase is part of the university’s financial plan to balance competing interests.

“We’re balancing the ability of parents and students to afford tuition, we’re balancing investments that we want to make on campus, we’re balancing the need to pay for ongoing expenses, so there’s a lot of balancing that’s going on,” Rubenstein said. “Even though inflation is low, there are ongoing inflationary increases in terms of fringe benefits for employees, investments that are made for new programs and things like that.”

Dean of Student Financial Services Patricia McWade said middle-income families — those that make up to $100,000 a year — will feel the effects of the hike.

“Middle income is really tough. We do expect a lot of sacrifice on the part of middle income families, so we look at their income and assets and analyze what we think the family can afford to pay,” McWade said. “Families are different. Some families have saved and some have spent. The result is that middle-upper and middle-income families have quite a responsibility to pay for their son or daughter’s education.”

Dean of Undergraduate Admissions Charles Deacon (CAS ’64, GRD ’69) said the hike will also impact families not receiving any financial aid — the combined direct and indirect costs of tuition, room and board, travel expenses, books and other costs — which makes up the cost of attendance.

“It affects students based on their ability to pay. It should have no impact on students that are receiving financial aid, because it means they’ll just get more financial aid, unless their circumstances change,” Deacon said.

However, McWade said the tuition rate increase does not affect the school’s commitment to meeting full demonstrated financial need, and that students currently on financial aid should not be concerned.

“In the 25 years I’ve been here, we’ve been unwavering on [meeting full demonstrated financial need], so I don’t think students should be concerned about that,” McWade said. “If the tuition is going up, will the financial aid be going up? It will, because we meet full financial need.”

Georgetown is one of a few dozen colleges and universities — including Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and Stanford University — that have prioritized need-blind, full-need admission policies since the late 1970s through a combination of loans, grants and work-study.

38.2 percent of the undergraduate student body received need-based scholarship aid in the last fiscal year.

Georgetown University Student Association Vice President Chris Fisk (COL ’17) said students who are concerned about the increase should understand the context of the decision.

“Georgetown, rather remarkably, manages an incredibly difficult relationship between a tight financial situation and its commitment to meeting 100 percent of demonstrated need,” Fisk said. “It’s important to understand that this year’s tuition increase is also accompanied by the university’s aspirations to expand need-based financial aid.”

Fisk also said the university has taken steps to slow hikes, even as students push for increased investment from the university.

“Additionally, it’s important to point out that the rates of Georgetown’s annual tuition increases have been declining, and our student body has been successfully pushing the university to provide more services and to better our campus in a number of ways, like housing renovations, expanding academic programs, etc., but the money to do these things needs to come from somewhere,” Fisk said.

Even so, Fisk said administrators should allow students a larger role in determining expenses.

“With all that said, students should definitely have a more meaningful role in deciding where money is spent on campus,” Fisk said.

Correction: This article previously stated the average cost of attendance – including room and board – at $66,296 for continuing students for the 2016-2017 year; the average cost of attendance is $70,140.

Have a reaction to this article? Write a letter to the editor.

3 Comments

  1. Hannibal Bateman says:

    Serious question: when did the GUSA Executive become shills for Healy?

    Really, it would be nice to know.

    I understand it’s too much to ask Enushe to do her job b/c she’s making money for Goldman Sachs in NYC instead of being on-campus this summer like she’s supposed to be according to GUSA by-laws, but shouldn’t Fisk or at least one of the several hundred GUSA reps and staff members inflating their resumes with fancy titles realize that it’s GUSA’s job to represent student interests before the administration, and not the other way around?

    Instead of what we currently have, which is Fisk putting a positive spin and selling out fellow students in order to promote yet another tuition increase, shouldn’t GUSA being trying to STOP or at the very least SLOW the incessant tuition increases? Or are they doing the administration’s bidding because they want that letter of recommendation from DeGioia for the Harvard app?

    So they raised tuition 4.3% last year, and will do it at 4% this year, and have committed to raising it 4% each year for the next four years. Tuition for 2016-2017 is now $49,968 and with room & board total cost of attending Georgetown is $66,296, according to The Hoya, though if you look at the Office of Financial Service website the total cost inclusive of fees and expenses (i.e. books, loan fees, class fees, Yates, etc.) is $69,770. We already know The Hoya frequently does shoddy work when they’re not biasing their articles so we’ll use the OFS numbers.

    Here’s the link so you can see the breakdown: https://finaid.georgetown.edu/cost-of-attendance/undergraduate

    Let’s do the math for someone graduating in 2020. We’ll assume room & board go up 4% as well. It’s fair to do so due to inflation, cost of living increases, and the fact that the University has no reason not to increase prices on things you’re required to pay but which don’t fall under “tuition.”

    So, here’s how it works out with annual 4% increases . . .

    Freshman Year: $69,770
    Sophomore Year: $72,561
    Junior Year: 75,463
    Senior Year: 78,482

    Total cost of for years at GU for incoming freshmen: $296,275. Throw in some unexpected expenses or travel (the OFS numbers low-ball it at $650 a year which is only works if you live close and don’t plan on going home for Christmas), and you’re easily over $300K.

    This is crazy, people.

    Just imagine the debt the rich kids and the affirmative action kids won’t have, but which will squeeze everyone in the middle or who can’t get a special scholarship. This is what’s known as indentured servitude, folks. And to think incoming students are having to pay for the privilege of taking to diversity requirement courses as well. God help those majoring the grievance industry courses! If you’re taking out loans, you better be in the business school, nursing, or SFS, and you better be majoring in something that will make you money when you graduate. Otherwise you’re going to have that debt yoked around your neck for a long, long time.

    Meanwhile, DeGioia makes over a million each year and has for ($1.3 million in 2014) . . .

    http://dcinno.streetwise.co/2014/12/08/highest-paid-college-presidents-chronicle-of-higher-education-ranking/

    He’s not even the highest paid though. JTIII makes about $2 million and only got us to the Final Four once about ten years ago.

    Someone explain to me again how Georgetown is a non-profit educational institution dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge and service to others but not a cash cow that enriches its own employees at the expense of students, parents, and the American taxpayer who fund all the loans. I’m genuinely curious here.

  2. This is absolutely disgusting. Arbitrarily raising tuition for students who will likely have to pay back loans for decades upon decades is about as evil a move as you can make.

  3. It’s not “meeting need” to saddle 17 year olds with 10s of thousands of dollars in student loans. What a disgrace.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>