Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

'The Bourne Legacy:' Fourth Time Not the Charm

Special to The Hoya

Published: Sunday, August 12, 2012

Updated: Monday, August 13, 2012 15:08

bourne

hollywoodreporter.com

2/5 stars

A new chapter in the Bourne series is upon us, and like many, I was skeptical as to how this film would compare to the first three installments. Unfortunately, my fears were confirmed as The Bourne Legacy falls well short of its predecessors.

Writer — and now director — Tony Gilroy continues the saga with the story of Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner), an agent similar to Jason Bourne — except for the fact that he knows exactly who he is. We are introduced to this new character in Alaska, where his survival skills are tested in a life-threatening gauntlet.

Eric Byer (Edward Norton) is a former colonel in the U.S. military who is attempting to prevent the disclosure of sensitive information regarding secret governmental programs. After all, “Jason Bourne is just the tip of the iceberg,” as Byer deadpans in the trailer.

While Byer goes to extreme measures to tie up loose ends, Cross — who is deemed a liability to the program — does what he can to protect himself from being eliminated. He shares this task with Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz), a scientist who assists in the aforementioned programs and whose knowledge has made her a risk. As the pair attempts to flee from the clutches of their former employer, they encounter numerous obstacles on their path to safety.

The Bourne Legacy is complex and draws heavily from the previous three movies, but instead of elevating the story, this makes it barely understandable to those who haven’t seen Matt Damon’s trilogy. There are flashbacks that attempt to explain relationships and details, but, with a few exceptions, they are irrelevant and unhelpful.

Even if one has seen the past movies, the plot is confusing but linear, thrusting the audience into the characters’ stories with very minimal explanation as to their origins, which becomes a problem. Furthermore, the story tries too hard to be fast paced and overly complex, forgoing development of characters and situations.

The film tries to follow in the footsteps of the other Bourne movies, but this one lacks the smooth transition with its story, leaving scenes scattered. The fact that Cross and Byer never interact directly is particularly detrimental, since it takes away from the conflict’s dynamic and makes the movie choppy and disconnected due to the repeated necessity to cut back and forth between the two.

The film, however, is visually striking. The action sequences are impressive, though some of the chase scenes are lengthier than one would like and they spend entirely too long in Alaska. But the icy landscape is beautiful to look at, and good camera angles provide breathtaking views that are well incorporated into scenes.

In terms of acting, Renner continues to demonstrate he is fit for genres that contain fight choreographies and an arsenal of challenging physical requirements. This, however, is unfortunately overshadowed by an occasionally awkward performance when he is forced to deviate from the stern, focused demeanor we are used to. His attempts to be funny and jovial come across as helplessly clumsy.

Weisz is a little tougher to judge, since aspects of her performance are impressive, while others seem overacted — a criticism also applicable to Norton. This is especially evident in her interactions with Renner. The duo is convincing at times but awkward at others due to the clear lack of chemistry. At points, both actors are clearly uncomfortable with their lines.

The film was backed into a corner from the start. Comparisons with the previous films are inevitable, but instead of creating a new identity, The Bourne Legacy attempts to emulate its predecessors and is ultimately unsuccessful in this endeavor. The movie introduces a new character but continues with the story as if he would smoothly fit into the plot with no explanation necessary. (He doesn’t.) The plot’s heavy dependence on the first three films, a questionable decision that gave fans high expectations for The Bourne Legacy, only drags it down.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments

Anonymous
Mon Aug 13 2012 20:44
ugh. Really? lame review. Renner was the only thing that saved that mess, and is the only reason I am praying for a better future installment. I enjoyed his humor, but it was completely unexpected in a Bourne film, considering Damon was essentially deadpan and guilt-ridden the whole time. It did, admittedly, catch me off guard at first, but I wouldn't call it "helplessly clumsy." It's called a "new character." Once I got that Cross was curious, inquisitive, open, playful and sarcastic, I knew I wasn't (refeshingly) looking at another Jason Bourne personality replacement. THAT would have pissed me off, because no one can do Bourne better than Damon. Weisz was great too, a lot of crying, but...overacting? Really? What soaps are you watching?

Beautifully shot, agreed, several action sequences overly long and could have been shot better, and the movie was too heavy on dialogue and conspiracy and not long enough on character development, also agreed. We need Byer/Cross/Bourne confrontation too. But come on, all you're going to talk about considering the acting is Renner's ability to punch someone? His performance is the ONLY reason in that chaos that I want another "Bourne" or "Cross" installment, but done properly.

You admitted that you already were reluctant to admit that Legacy would live up to the trilogy (which, of course it couldn't) in the beginning of your article. My question is if you were open to seeing a movie without Bourne in the first place. You glossed over many of the films obvious errors to attack the casting and fail to note that, while the dependence upon the first three films can become annoying, they are fundamentally essential to the plot line to those who have both seen and haven't seen the trilogy.

Be careful, reporter. Negative presuppositions lead to confirmation bias.

Ultimately, to each their own, I just hate it when idiots like this get to have a bigger say in their "own" by being a "critic"

Bourne Legacy 4/5, with many different errors and plot holes not specified by this "critic" above, but still holding potential. As an avid Bourne fan, I walked into Legacy knowing this could never touch the trilogy. It's a side-boot. See it for what it is, not what it never could be.





log out