Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

'Fifty Shades' of Dirty Plots and Worse Writing

Online Exclusive

Hoya Staff Writer

Published: Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Updated: Monday, July 23, 2012 16:07

grey

tower.com

I’m often late to the party when it comes to popular literature. I caught up to The Hunger Games only after my beloved editor told me how great it was — and I wasn’t disappointed. So when she asked me to read E. L. James’ Fifty Shades of Grey, I figured this similarly popular book would be a good read as well. I was dead wrong.

Frankly, I have no idea why anyone has given this book a positive review. I could not have found a bigger waste of paper if I tried.

On the first page, James introduces Anastasia Steele, a recent college graduate who is quickly swept up in the arms of Christian Grey, a young, self-made, smoky billionaire who seems perfect — minus his dominant-submissive sex habit. Told from Ana’s perspective, the book explores how she changes as she becomes involved with Mr. Grey.

Spoiler alert: She doesn’t change at all.

A lot of the rumors circulating about the book are true: Yes, Christian Grey controls — or at least tries to control — Ana’s every move. Yes, he has a contract drafted by his lawyer that she signs before they begin their role play. And yes, there’s even a special room where he keeps all of his “toys.”

I assumed I would find the story of a girl who lost herself in a submissive relationship — that the relationship would change her, forcing her to question herself. Frankly, the book would have been better if she had.

I wasn’­t at all surprised when she predictably fell in love with him — she gushes over him from the first chapter. I, too, would probably fall in love with a handsome man who paid for a luxurious lifestyle and gave me intense orgasms. So she falls in love with Mr. Grey but still walks out, even though he never once does anything to her without her permission. Their contract is never broken, but she inexplicably changes her mind.

What boggles my mind and frankly really annoys me is that Ana remains the same witty — albeit whiney — college graduate throughout her relationship until she leaves. She has a brief relationship with a rich man who takes her virginity and has some weird habits but is good at sex. Then she leaves him because she suddenly decides that his habits are creepy. As my esteemed colleague Jeremy Tramer (SFS ’12) once wrote, ipso facto ergo latino, she’s a normal person, remains normal throughout the book and then continues to be normal.

James peppers the plot, if you can call it that, with the infamous sex scenes. The graphic nature of the book hasn’t been understated by critics: Some of the content is extremely explicit — but not in a good way. It’s done in the kind of way that makes me feel like I will never be able to wash away the shame from having read such disgusting details. After reading the book in Barnes & Noble, I felt like I had committed a humiliating crime.

The atrocious writing robs any credibility the book might have retained. The whole thing is so poorly crafted that nothing struck me as believable. I expected Fifty Shades to provide a unique take on sex. It does not. Nor does it provide any useful insight to the world of, shall we say, alternative preferences, because it lacks meaningful descriptions or any analyses.

When I brought up this point to a friend of mine, he reminded me that I have no way of knowing what is credible and what isn’t in these circumstances. This is true: Beyond the fact that I am also female and in college, Ana and I have nothing in common. But I have to think that if I’m questioning James’ command of the English language above a middle school level, it’s legitimate to question as well whether she knows what she’s talking about.

My biggest problem with the book was that the entire premise is completely unrealistic. I had a hard time believing that Ana, an independent, self-assured college graduate, who also happened to be a beautiful virgin who never dated anyone until she met Christian, decided to give up all her personal agency to him after knowing him for one weekend. I didn’t believe that his brother would just happen to fall in love with her roommate, giving them an excuse to hang out. And I couldn’t believe that Christian would be willing to pay for all her food, numerous flights on private jets, computers, cars, Blackberries, et cetera in order to keep an eye on a girl he’s just met but still wants to do daily, nightly and ever so rightly every weekend. This isn’t a substantive story but rather the wistful daydreams of a hormone enraged 15-year-old with a dirty imagination.

Apparently there’s a second and third book in the series. I have no idea why. I thought we were done with boring Ana and her weird little sex life. I cannot imagine what James has against trees that she keeps producing these “novels.” While I understand I can’t actually stop you from buying this book, I wish I could. You’ll never get back the time — or money — wasted.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

8 comments

Lorraine
Fri Jul 6 2012 12:14
What a great review - wish I'd read it before wasting my time on these books! However, everyone I work with is reading them and I'm the only one who isn't enjoying them - they all think I'm wierd! It's not just the erotic bits that I'm bored with but the repetitive descriptions - how many times can you say the same thing? I feel nothing for the two main characters and wish there were more peripheral characters to get interested in. As the reviewer says, it's boring, unbelievable and a total waste of time money and effort!
Anonymous
Thu Jun 14 2012 07:45
It's complex- because he actually "grows" her ego- her self confidence through the story- just the fact that he cares for her, listens to her, values her- feeds her goddess. Her personality is fixed- but people can get smarter and she does - and so does he. He finds out he's capable of more than he thought and learns to love himself. Maybe idealistic- but its all escapism/ fantasy and it's what we'd all love to dream in an ideal world -would be possible for the adult life of an abused child.?
Anonymous
Thu Jun 14 2012 07:32
"I assumed I would find the story of a girl who lost herself in a submissive relationship - that the relationship would change her, forcing her to question herself." "...decided to give up all her personal agency to him after knowing him for one weekend. "
Maybe your assumptions about it ruined it for you? Everyone sees things differently . Most people don't change that much? She's the "ideal heroine" - has poor self esteem- little confidence but reality is she's very self contained & strong- all through. She falls in love - & that can occasionally be a fairly instant thing. She does weigh up the situation, she goes with it -explores her feelings for him, trusts her instincts, but she keeps her "agency" . She's stays the same person and that's why she never once lets herself submit?

"Then she leaves him because she suddenly decides that his habits are creepy"..
"...even though he never once does anything to her without her permission. "
"Their contract is never broken, but she inexplicably changes her mind."

Maybe you have to read the other books as the other comments suggest. Maybe its very complex?- grey thing here ? Grey has only partial self awareness, insight. He wants her, yet he hates himself, thinks himself damaged goods and unworthy of anyone's love & he also sees himself incapable of a relationship (classic abuse). He's never done it before. He's anxious. His confident persona is purely a veneer. Underneath a scared immature boy. He hides behind his corporate success, staff, smart possessions and his right hand man. He tells her this arrangement is all above board- but he's not being entirely straight with her- because he really wants her - he can't do whats right & let her go. . So he pretends. In part- he does believe there is great pleasure to be had in being his "sub " but he also knows it's wrong in this instance- like Tess- she's too good for him and he worries that he'll destroy her . He beats her in a violent manner that goes way beyond what he knows is her understanding of that unsigned contract . Its a moment when she provokes him to come out and finally show himself- be honest with her - and he does. He wants to beat her- and hurt her the same violent way he would beat his mother if he could- for leaving him, for letting him be abused. He shows her just how bad, how unworthy he is- and in part he probably wants to make her leave- because he knows he's not worthy of her. Brave in a way for him to do it, brave of her to provoke it- but necessary. And it treads a really fine line between abuse and selfless love - which is interesting. Perhaps only those wanting to interpret it that way will get anything out of the story

Katie Scarpulla (COL '14)
Thu Jun 14 2012 00:58
Awesome, so I'll be the only one who isn't "Anonymous." I don't know who Katherine is, but calling her a snob is not okay. The book is garbage. I've read it. Beside the matter, the best line EVER: "I, too, would probably fall in love with a handsome man who paid for a luxurious lifestyle and gave me intense orgasms." YES.
Anonymous
Thu Jun 14 2012 00:43
I disagree with the "wow you're a snob" comment above. Just because something is popular does not mean there MUST be some redeeming quality at all...this is a ludicrous and unsubstantiated statement. I have not even read one sentence of this book, but I appreciate this review; very well written, and I would tend to think that I would probably agree with the fact that this woman is probably truly wasting trees :)
Anonymous
Wed Jun 13 2012 23:58
Yes, just like jersey shore must have some redeeming qualities because it is so popular, right? Horrendous excuse for a novel.
Anonymous
Wed Jun 13 2012 20:05
I give you that it isn't the best writing in the world, but if you actually read the 2nd and 3rd books it actually has a pretty fun and interesting plot that makes it a really enjoyable beach read.
Anonymous
Wed Jun 13 2012 14:48
Wow you're a snob.

Can't you at least admit that a book this popular must have SOME redeeming qualities? Not all literature needs to be Jane Austen. The fact that it's so popular must mean there is something good in there.





log out