Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Raising the Grade: Let’s Talk About Sex

Published: Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Updated: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:04

yang 4.19

Daniel Yang

Disconcerted Demagogue | Daniel Yang

With high standards in the classroom, Georgetown has work to do in bedroom education after ranking 120th out of 141 schools in the 2010 Trojan Sexual Health Report Card.

Sexual health education has long been a hot-button issue on campus because of the university's Catholic identity. But the university has taken a step forward with its announcement of a sexual health peer education group, sponsored by Health Education Services. If given the proper leeway, this student group could be a firm step forward in improving the sexual health resources on campus.

The sexual health statistics in the United States are startling: One in every two sexually active young people will contract a sexually transmitted disease by age 25. The U.S. teen pregnancy rate is among the highest in the developed world — twice that of Canada and Sweden. One in every four women in college has either been raped or experienced a rape attempt.

Despite this alarming data, Georgetown has lagged behind comparable universities in providing information about sexual health to its students. Students in a Biology of Global Health class recently surveyed 676 students from across the country. When asked how they would rate sexual education on their respective campuses, 23 percent of Georgetown students called it "nonexistent," while only 14 percent of non-Georgetown students said the same.

As a Catholic university, Georgetown has the right to restrict on-campus access to contraceptives and limit university insurance coverage. However, the university has a responsibility to educate its students about sexually transmitted disease and sexual assault.

The university should embrace its Jesuit tradition of education and social justice by spreading awareness and encouraging openness in the discussion of this controversial topic. In caring for the whole person, the university should not neglect a facet of its students' health simply because it may be uncomfortable. Though pre-marital sex goes against Catholic doctrine, student health needs to take precedence. By supporting information about how to manage a sexually transmitted disease or assault, the university is adequately empowering students without promoting behavior contrary to Catholic doctrine.

While the creation of a sexual health peer education group will be a step in the right direction, there is still uncertainty regarding the group's jurisdiction and role on campus. The university could easily take two steps backward if in the name of religion it fails to equip the group to freely provide necessary information. The group should be able to engage in frank dialogue with students to dispel myths and promote safe practices as a part of the university's initiative to create a greater on-campus support system surrounding sexual health issues. As an institution that values education, the university has an obligation to provide the necessary means for students to stay safe and informed.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Sat Sep 10 2011 17:45
"Though pre-marital sex goes against Catholic doctrine, student health needs to take precedence."

How convenient to boil this down to matter of 'doctrine' as if we're all oppressed here by that terrible out-dated, paternalistic, oppressive Catholic dogma!

The reality is that fornication goes against the HUMAN PERSON. It is detrimental to man's body, soul, emotional and relational well being. "In the spirit of cura personalis" let's really have student health 'take precedence.' Let's crack open Humanae Vitae. Let's explore John Paul II's Theology of the Body and Love and Responsibility. Let's draw on 2000 years of the Church's wisdom and really care for the entirety of the human person- body, mind and soul.

Finally, the 'editorial board' seems to set up this false dichotomy between treating STDs and helping assault victims and Catholic doctrine. I don't really see how this is intellectually credible as the Catholic church is in no way against people getting medical care nor is She against helping assault victims. As already said, this agenda is about getting condoms on campus. The University ought to be educating students about the harm they can do to their bodies by contracting these diseases. The University ought to be educating students about the harm they can do to their souls and their entire well being by fornicating. The University ought to offer the Church's true and holy teaching on sexuality as the answer.

Anon
Wed Apr 27 2011 02:16
So Catholic doctrine at a Catholic University must take a back seat to "student health?" How is this audacious nonsense permitted to be published at what is supposed to be a Catholic institution. The (obviously non-Catholic) children on the editorial board are blinded by the delusion and lies of the modern world. The editorial board of the Hoya yet again engages in persecution of the Church, Catholics, and the spiritual health of GU's student body.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 21 2011 20:45
The author seems to be entirely confused in conflating two issues. Rape and other forms of sexual assault have nothing to do with sexual health and everything to do with crime. Learning how to protect oneself against crime is valuable but has nothing to do with "sex education".
CAS 1982
Tue Apr 19 2011 17:05
As a Jesuit university Georgetown's responsibility is to educate its students about the Catholic theological view of sexuality. One of the greatest failings at many Catholic universities is to engage its students freshman year on this topic. How many students have read, discussed or even heard of Pope John Paul II's Theology of the Body? Tragic really. Instead they fall into the trap of needing to be "safe & informed", the sexual swamp, that pervades modern society, creating persons incapable of forming lasting relationships, and the debasement of the human person. Georgetown needs to avoid the dictatorship of relativism and speak the truth here, of God's design for human sexuality and the dignity of the person.

Lets not muddle this issue by including the crime of sexual assault, that is not what this agenda is all about. The agenda is to get condoms on campus and access to abortion services. Georgetown must stand firm. For those students who do not wish to adhere to the Church's teaching, there is a flood of information easily available on-line so that they can be "empowered".

One final note, your editorial references the Trojan Sexual Health Report Card. Surely, Trojan has no business motive in driving this conversation and definitiion of safe sex, which I believe means buy a Trojan condom and use one each time. Exactly whose interests are they looking after? Surely not the emotionally and spiritually broken persons made incapable of true love by a history of promiscuity.





log out