Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

The State of the University

Published: Thursday, January 26, 2012

Updated: Thursday, January 26, 2012 19:01

Faculty at universities nowadays come and go fairly regularly, so it is a rare professorial announcement that shakes a school.

Recently, Patrick Deneen, a former columnist for this paper and professor of government, announced his departure from Georgetown for the University of Notre Dame. Seeking a place that more fully embraces the Catholic identity of its founding and the Western philosophical and literary canon, Deneen has, through his actions, put the question of this university's character squarely into focus.

At one end is the vision of the traditional Catholic college, which puts special emphasis on Church teaching and classical education. At the other is a machine where departments and committees and working groups independently spin as little cogs in a great apparatus that clanks along, all the while doing groundbreaking research and perfecting the manufacture of various widgets. Any honest appraisal of Georgetown would place her more in the latter category, and there are certainly tangible benefits in being a forward-thinking research university. Federal funding flows freely, research teams discover the cure for some malady and the prestige of the place grows in direct proportion to the advancements it can offer to modern life. What dies, however, is the soul of the college.

I confess I am not a dispassionate observer in this contest. I admire and am involved in the work of the Tocqueville Forum, and regard professor Deneen as an incisive mind and a consummate gentleman. A university is bigger than any single individual, but he represents something that is dear to Georgetown, and which she is in danger of losing.

Deneen's business — and the business of all great teachers — is to challenge students to think about the world and to get in tune with what is timelessly true. Skills for the workforce will be developed in the workforce; the life of the mind is the university's charge. Ideally, college graduates would come out broadly educated, able to understand the centuries of thought that have delved into the question of what it is to be human.

Professor Deneen and others like him have long fought to revive humane letters, and to help undergraduates find this common humanity. It is often glimpsed in Plato and St. Thomas, Bonaventure and Tully. How many students, though, have read any part of the Summa and could give a reasonable account of Thomistic prudence? Forgetting that, who could name the century in which the man lived and wrote?

What we need now more than ever are living, breathing teachers who can vivify these authors and ideas and explain why they are so important.

Perhaps more alarming, though, is Deneen's explicit grievance at the lack of Catholicism at this place. We are Georgetown, the nation's oldest and preeminent Roman Catholic college, founded by no less than the first Catholic bishop in the United States. We are the touchstone of Catholic education in this country. If Georgetown loses the faith, who indeed is left to defend it?

In a word, it is a tragedy that brilliant Catholic academics who wish to integrate their religious convictions into their vocation no longer feel welcome in Washington. We will never go back to being a small religious school. To have the space compressed, however, for those who would defend the old ways, and to squeeze them out slowly is the best example of eradicating intellectual diversity from a place that ostensibly prizes free discourse and thought.

We are not yet a trade school — though we move precipitously closer — and there is unlikely to be a university-wide move towards refocusing on the humanities. Deneen's departure is emblematic of the fact that classical learning no longer feels able even to compete. The loss of the one end upsets the equilibrium of the university and makes it poorer overall, and those who would disparage Deneen and his philosophy end up losing the only thing that keeps them in grounded perspective.

We cannot be better off without the Patrick Deneens of the world to question and probe our deepest convictions, and when we lose the animating force that makes this school distinct, only hollow men await.

Stephen Wu is a junior in the College.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments

jack
Sat Jan 28 2012 09:50
@Wait what?:

It seems that the burden of proof is on you to tell us why studying such things are not important. Hundreds upon hundreds of years of academic endeavors and thinkers have already told us why the Western canon is vital. Indeed, the University as we know it would not exist were it not for the centrality of the western tradition in the formation of man's mind.

not chet gillis
Fri Jan 27 2012 17:02
Wait, what?:

Perhaps you can tell us, but I'll get you started:

Because there are certain things eternal and things divine, including man's soul. To deny this is tyrannical. It is the task of the University to awaken students to seek to know such things, that is, to seek the Truth. That is the most liberating thing, hence the idea of a 'liberal education'--- it is to become more truly human. The reason, in a word, we do such things for their own sake.

WD
Fri Jan 27 2012 16:18
The destination between being a big school and retaining our religious identity and tradition to liberal arts is a false distinction. If Georgetown were to dedicate a small portion of its resources to recruiting more jesuits and providing on campus space for groups like the Tocqueville forum to engage with campus, rather than relegating it to the far reaches of Prospect Street and regarding it as a heresy to be crushed, we would be a better university and still be able to have our large student body and gaudy business school building. Professor Deneen's actions prove that community can still be found even in the heart of a large university. But more than this, you have to ask the question of whether the mere accumulation of various scholars who share nothing in common in giant lavish building is truly the proper end of education. As the gospel implies, for what shall it profit a university if it gains the whole world yet loses its soul.
Anonymous
Fri Jan 27 2012 15:11
You are right in saying it can be either a small, religious-themed college or a prestigious research university. Most prominent universities in the US were founded with some sort of religious affiliation which has long since fallen by the wayside. If Georgetown wants to compete and be considered a serious University it has to do the same or be happy with being a provincial, regional school.
Wait, what?
Fri Jan 27 2012 11:37
"What we need now more than ever are living, breathing teachers who can vivify these authors and ideas and explain why they are so important." You can't tell us why they are so important. The biggest champion for "the humane letters" in the undergraduate population, and you can't even give us a sentence or a phrase why knowing Thomistic prudence is at all important for our lives.
Anonymous
Fri Jan 27 2012 10:23
God i hated the tocqueville forum, i'm glad its dying.
Anonymous
Fri Jan 27 2012 08:41
Great piece, Mr. Wu. I do not know if you were a part of Deneen's seminar, "The End of Education," but he would certainly enjoy this article.






log out