Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Pro-Life Students Lead Shift

Published: Friday, February 8, 2013

Updated: Friday, February 8, 2013 17:02

While the 40th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision that has allowed for the abortion of 50 million American children passed two weeks ago, the week was also marked by the 14th annual Cardinal O’Connor Conference on Life. The Cardinal O’Connor Conference, the nation’s largest student-run, pro-life conference and named after Georgetown alumnus and pro-life warrior John Cardinal O’Connor, is important because it directly addressed the concerns brought up by Haylie Jacobson’s viewpoint “Pro-Choice Broader than Abortion Issue” (THE HOYA, A3, Feb. 5, 2013). In fact, if Jacobson and those with similar beliefs had attended the conference, they would most certainly be better informed on the issues they claim to champion.

As represented in the conference, the pro-life movement has moved far beyond the abortion issue as it follows the calls of Cardinal O’Connor to build “a culture of life,” one which recognizes his ecclesiastical motto that “there can be no love without justice.” Speakers at the Cardinal O’Connor Conference continue to share their expertise in a number of fields and life issues, such as abortion, bioethics, reproductive health, the rights of the disabled, adoption and the death penalty. The conference reaffirms that being pro-life is the proper understanding of “care for the whole person” and goes one step further to care for all persons. That is why — led by our generation — the pro-life movement is winning. We seek justice for all individuals, especially the most defenseless and innocent in our society: the child in the womb.

On the other hand, the pro-“choice” movement is indeed radicalizing as Jacobson feared, precisely because it cannot reasonably oppose the culture of life in the same way it can legally oppose laws on abortion. Instead of being actually concerned about pregnant women and their children, a fair critique about some elements of the pro-life movement, the pro-choicers have entirely abandoned any pretext of caring about the person. As reflected by Jacobson’s viewpoint, they put the idea of completely unrestrained choice above the person themselves.

As keynote speaker Helen Alvaré detailed in her impassioned appeal to the over 650 students and adults, it is time that we finally suspend our disbelief that the promises of the pro-choice movement have simply not been met, and have done more harm than good. Fifty million of our potential peers, brothers, sisters, friends and spouses were killed in the womb. As the pro-choice movement retreats to radical ideology, the pro-life movement continues to build a true culture of life and respect for the dignity of all people, from conception to natural death.

Students at Georgetown have been — and continue to be — leaders in this shift from just a concern about the Roe v. Wade decision to a concern about the “whole person.” The Cardinal O’Connor Conference continues to educate attendees and generate informed discussion on the sound intellectual roots of the pro-life movement. Georgetown alumni founded the Northwest Crisis Pregnancy, Washington’s largest crisis-pregnancy center that has served over 46,000 women and children. Georgetown University Right to Life continues to host service projects like babysitting and collecting diapers for young mothers at Georgetown who balance work and class. Jacobson’s article is certainly right that the pro-choice movement is losing conviction because it focuses on a radical, impersonal idea. In the meantime, I am proud to see my university community leading the incredible pro-life shift in our generation and truly living out the Jesuit values of our alma mater.

Kevin Sullivan is a junior in the School of Foreign Service.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments

Anonymous Hoya
Mon Feb 11 2013 17:26
The assertion that "the pro-"choice" movement is indeed radicalizing" is simply wrong. It IS a sad sign radicalization that in order to give the facade the "pro-life" movement on campus is strong and the "pro-choice" is fizzling out the campus has to deny "pro-choice" groups freedom of speech while holding a national conference in support of "pro-life."
The general feelings of Americans have been generally stable since the passage of Roe v. Wade 40 years ago, which is that most people are in favor of women deciding in most situations, while a vast minority thinks Abortion should be illegal in all situations. The only small trend, which has been growing more recently, is towards more people pro-choice in most situations. Far from being radical moreover, the issue is of little importance to the majority of people and it's only the emphatic minority (or as you would say radicals) who place importance on the issue.
I'm not saying anything about whose right. Many people my self included are iffy on weather late term (3rd trimester) abortions should be legal and others (myself not included) are concerned about whether abortions should be allowed on basis the child will have a severe illness. It's not easy nor a clean but issue whether is should be conception or 1 trimester, 2 trimester, 2.5 or so on that we draw the line. Again, however, very very few are simply against the legal right.
I'm not saying the Pro-Life conference doesn't have its place. Like any political action group it is fine to raise awareness of a cause, which it can and should do even if it is a minority. But the radicalism of reporting made up facts and demonizing other groups in this article shouldn't have their place in the most prestigious newspaper on campus. (In fact if such false, fringe, and hate provoking rhetoric were used to describe an issue like gay rights or other religions validity it would most likely violate the university's arcane speech code).
Perhaps the way the University, as a place of learning should, tackles every other issue, which would be to open the floor to the beliefs and thoughts diverse student body we would all leave with a better appreciation of the other side. It's possible to leave the discussion unchanged. But at least have the discussion rather than pumping out this poppycock.




log out