Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Job Hunt Haunted by SAT

Published: Friday, September 21, 2012

Updated: Friday, September 21, 2012 01:09

Perfidious. Deleterious. Capacious. Miss these three common SAT vocabulary words as a senior in high school, and your score could drop 50 points. These days, it might also cost you your first job after graduation.

It has become a rising — and troubling — trend for employers to request the SAT scores of recent college graduates applying for jobs. The SAT is indeed an effective tool for sorting through college applicants, but it’s inappropriate to consider high school test scores when evaluating job candidates in their 20s. In a struggling economy, prospects for post-graduation employment are getting worse, and in this respect, so is the fairness of hiring.

In today’s competitive job market, employers are understandably searching for new ways to distinguish between applicants. But asking for SAT scores isn’t a reasonable way to do that. The SAT is designed to gauge high school students’ preparedness for college, but that’s much different than college students’ professional competence for entry-level positions. A successful college career should discredit bad SAT scores, not the other way around.

Furthermore, there is no conclusive evidence that SAT scores serve as an accurate indicator of intelligence or potential job performance. Employers in the financial sector who want to see quantitative skills should focus on the most recent examples of a candidate’s proficiency in that area, which demonstrate current ability in a more comparable environment to the prospective job. A standardized test taken four or more years ago says little about the skills a college graduate can bring to a position.

A disappointing SAT performance might be a lifelong sore spot, but it should not haunt a student’s financial future. Although the job hiring process may not be perfect, taking into account outdated and imprecise test results solves nothing. These employers should remember that they are hiring people, not test scores.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Sun Sep 30 2012 17:55
@Hoya Alum 04

You are being ridiculous. There have to be indicators for employers to use to choose employees -- you can't possibly believe that people should not list GPAs on job applications. I'm sure kids that work hard to get a good GPA should be rewarded. If Georgetown withheld GPA and other testing info from employers, they would probably just stop hiring through Georgetown.

And you say that HR hiring people aren't as smart as the people they hire, but why does that matter? Basketball scouts aren't as good as the players they draft, but they are still good at recognizing talent.

Anonymous
Fri Sep 21 2012 18:40
Yet, there's an inherent irony here. The folks in HR doing the screening themselves probably could not score in the range for Georgetown, yet they are screening talent that way and deciding who fits a numerical mold. By implementing an arbitrary numerical range, you are removing the human element of building a workforce. One's talent to accurately bubble in a scantron has virtually no correlation to his or her ability to build rapport with customers, bring in new business and provide insight. I might as well take the 1984 track of tattooing my SS number to my wrist. So much for looking at one's holistic abilities--isn't this why we chose GU versus other common app elite universities--because we wanted to develop the whole person. So I pose the rhetorical--when delivering a report as a consultant, on the masthead, do you include one's educational CV, their SAT score, GPA, etc?

I would think that GU should uphold its resistance of the common app and follow suit with a grade non-disclosure policy. Other schools' grad programs follow that and I wonder why we aren't as well? Chances are, there might be a few bad apples in the bunch, but most all that were able to get into GU are smart enough to do the entry level job.

Sadly, this HR tactic leads one to believe that the US workforce is drifting towards that of developing countries, where a test score decides one's fate and there's no human element to advancement. I thought we were a country that values individuality, rewarding innovation. Seems like HR should consult the Harvard School of Education's theory of multiple intelligences.

Hoya Alum '04

Anonymous
Fri Sep 21 2012 13:49
I disagree. SAT scores are an excellent objective indicator to distinguish between two candidates. While it is obvious to employers who attends Georgetown, its not always so easy to tell who got in due to legacy, affirmative action, preferred athlete palcement or other factors that would not directly demanding an objective datapoint, helps employers cut through all the other crap that admission counselrs have to deal accomodate.
Anonymous
Fri Sep 21 2012 11:45
Unfortunately for some, higher SAT Math scores DO correlate to better job performance in the consulting--this is why many consulting firms request scores. I think you have a point though: low scores should not automatically disqualify an applicant. But employers should view an 800 on SAT Math as an indicator of quantitative abilities.




log out