Georgetown's Confederacy of Dunces

Another election year, another scandal. When I came to visit Georgetown in the spring before my freshman year, I was struck by two things. The first one was our basketball team, which, despite a drought in the last games, continues to create a sense of school belonging and spirit of which I feel blessed to be a part. The second one was the Georgetown University Student Association.

Coming from a school where elections were a popularity contest, Georgetown seemed to be a place where students finally had a true voice and true representatives. This was just a façade, however, and if I had any faith left in our supposedly “democratic” system, Tuesday proved me wrong for good.

All was well until the night before, when two tickets were disqualified hours before the election for not heeding a previous warning for misplaced flyers and signs. Whether this was a just decision is not for me to say and frankly, that’s not the point. The disqualification was confirmed and election night began, minus two tickets.

I was approached by the remaining candidates several times and they struck me with their motivation and ambition. It was D-Day for GUSA elections and there was no going back. The next morning the buzz continued — tickets were calling, e-mailing and approaching everyone they knew.

And then, a shock. An announcement was made that election was suspended. And that’s where my problem begins. The GUSA Senate called a meeting in order to figure out how to address the disqualifications and resolve the crisis.

I won’t get into the sad show that the meeting proved to be, exemplified by Jeffrey Lamb (MSB ’10) — a possible president and part of the two disqualified tickets — nearly getting into a fight with another candidate.

It is mind-boggling to me how an election that had already taken in votes and was nearing a conclusion could be halted so suddenly. What have we done to the principles of democracy our school prides itself on?

What should we tell the other candidates, who have put so much effort into campaigning without being disqualified? What should we tell the student body, which logged on to vote? Finally, what image of Georgetown does this project? In the two years that I have been here, we have been unable to hold an election without the tentacles of the authorities intervening.

­Charaf El Mansouri (MSB ’11) Feb. 25, 2009

To send a letter to the editor on a recent campus issue or Hoya story or a viewpoint on any topic, contact opinion@thehoya.com. Letters should not exceed 300 words, and viewpoints should be between 600 to 800 words.

Spirit Spirit
Feb 28 2009 at 1:58 a.m.

"It is mind-boggling to me how an election that had already taken in votes and was nearing a conclusion could be halted so suddenly. What have we done to the principles of democracy our school prides itself on?"

First, the election was suspended. All the votes that had been cast were still recorded, and if it resumed, would not be affected.

But second, and more broadly, democracy is about the rule of law and the will of the people, right?

Do you think it's democratic to arbitrarily ban two tickets from running for violating no rules? Do you think that, for that reason, the final vote might not represent the true will of the people, if over 500-600 people at least are in the Facebook groups of the two disqualified tickets combined?

Don't you think it's more democratic to sort it out and decide if they were correctly disqualified first? If they were, the vote would resume - no harm, no foul. If they weren't, continuing the erroneous vote and releasing the vote totals would irreparably damage the two tickets.

If students don't like how the two tickets have behaved, althoguh in violation of no by-laws, don't vote for them. It's as simple as that.

David Hollands David Hollands
Mar 18 2009 at 3:58 a.m.

The winning election slate in '82 was Mardicks/Perez, with their oh-so-true slogan, "All the candidates are jokes - at least we're funny!" Not much has changed I guess...

David Hollands
SBA "82

Post New Comment

Comments which are spam, off-topic, abusive, use excessive foul language or promote hate or bias will be deleted.

Anonymous comments will be held for moderation. This may take some time, so we recommend you create a free account. If you want a small picture next to your comments, get a gravatar.

Already have an account? Then login.