Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

‘Exorcist’ Author: GU Abusing Identity

Published: Friday, October 26, 2012

Updated: Friday, October 26, 2012 02:10

I loved Georgetown from the first day that I set my footlocker down in Healy Circle and asked an upperclassman how to find a room to put it in. I loved the Jesuits, too. In my novel “The Exorcist,” I thanked them for “teaching me to think.”

Georgetown gave me the gift of a liberal education that included the keys of reason to unlock the mysteries of faith. Throughout an undeservedly wonderful life, I have been guided by the light of my Georgetown education, grounded firmly, as I had been even in my youth, in the unmatched intellectual wealth of the Catholic Church. Each time I faltered — as I often did, sometimes grievously — that light never failed to come to my rescue.

What I owe Georgetown, however, is nothing compared to what she owes her founders and the Christ of Faith. It grieves me deeply that my alma mater is failing so scandalously in its debt to both, as well as to the militant Jesuits still buried there who made it so special for so long. Georgetown today seems to take pride in insulting the Church and offending the faithful.

I know that some students, or the earnest Jesuit, will point out the liturgies, the chaplains, the Knights of Columbus chapter and so on. Administrators assure me that they speak to the archbishop and visit Rome regularly. I know the litany all too well. But it describes a Potemkin village, complete now with long, waving banners.

Those who believe this illusion seem satisfied with their little Catholic ghetto. It contrasts so starkly with the archdiocese’s view of things. On May 10, its official publication stated plainly that, at Georgetown today, “leadership and faculty find their inspiration in sources other than the Gospel and Catholic teaching,” and that “the vision guiding university choices does not clearly reflect the light of the Gospel and authentic Catholic teaching.”

Of course, the decimation of “Catholic” began long ago when we first looked with envy toward Harvard and reduced the Jesuit curriculum. The dissidents came later, some in Roman collars and others who found personal gain in the movement against Church authority. Georgetown galloped toward secularism; even crucifixes disappeared from classrooms.

Then, in the early 1980s, a top New York public relations firm counseled the university that it was misguided to diminish its Catholic identity. Their report showed how Catholic identity was a valuable “brand” to be exploited in fundraising and recruitment. Georgetown got the memo but pursued a cynical path. In the prose, Latin quotes and other cosmetics, Georgetown would tell the world that it was “Catholic and Jesuit.” At black-tie alumni dinners, a Jesuit would be placed at every table like a flower centerpiece. The march toward secularism and moral relativism continued.

Debate is the servant of truth. In this case, debating whether Georgetown is Catholic has itself become a deception. Some say yes, some say no. But it does not matter what we think. There is only one accrediting agency that gets the last word. In 1990, Pope John Paul II, a former university professor, finally issued a normative constitution for Catholic universities, Ex Corde Ecclesiae. Georgetown has a metric, but its leaders have chosen willfully to ignore it.

It is not too late. I have formed the Father King Society to unite students, faculty, parents and alumni to make Georgetown honest, Catholic and better. Students and faculty have joined us. Anyone interested can contact me. The courageous are welcome.

To become authentically Catholic again does not mean returning to the past. It means building something entirely new, a new way for our university to meet the world that Georgetown’s old guard might be unable to imagine. Among other things, a Catholic university will defend academic freedom against the illiberal and intolerant new orthodoxies that allow no dissension from their new truths, as is happening at Georgetown today.

Our new society is named for Fr. Tom King, S.J., who, in 1991, assisted a first canonical petition to stop Georgetown’s slow separation from the Church. That petition asked the Church to strip the university of its Catholic label if it did not stop funding abortion advocacy. Georgetown reversed itself. Soon, we will ask the Church to do something quite different. Our excitement is palpable. Like Jesuit Father Karras, we do it for “love.”

WILLIAM PETER BLATTY graduated from the College in 1950. He won the Academy Award for best adapted screenplay for adapting his best-selling novel “The Exorcist” for the 1973 movie of the same title.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

Anonymous
Sun Nov 11 2012 00:37
Catholicism is about truth and what the GU students are spouting is opinion (and poorly formed at that).
The very fact that the faculty at Georgetown defended one Sandra Fluke's outburst on her rights and need for birth control is proof that the teachings of the Catholic Church are not found at Georgetown. Ignoring the moral issue, it would behoove the students (and faculty) to know that if you are talking about healthcare, then birth control is counter-productive. Birth control pills have been classified by the World Health Organization as a Group 1 carcinogen (most carcinogenic). They are linked to breast cancer, blood clots, deep vein thrombosis, heart attack and strokes. Discharge into our waters has deformed and sterilized fish populations and is now linked to the increase in prostate cancer. Talk about toxic pollution! And if you are speaking about other methods of birth control, none of them can "protect" 100% against pregnancies or sexually-transmitted diseases/infections and they won't protect a person's heart or mental condition. 90% of people who live together before marriage, split up. 1 out of every 10 couples are infertile (STDs cause infertility and now the vaccine Gardasil has been linked to "ovarian failure" (permanent infertility). HPV is extremely contagious and there are nearly 100 strains, all of which can cause cancer. The widely touted Gardasil protects against 4 of the strains and in the first year of use, over 17,000 adverse effects were reported to VAERS, including death, seizures, paralysis and Epstein Barre. It has been banned in India after 3 deaths were reported and there is a highly-effective campaign going on in Austria to ban or limit its use by one of Austria's prominent female doctors.
Prevention is the most cost effective way to reduce healthcare costs. Education is paramount. GU is not educating its students, either morally or rationally. It is a grace that Mr. Blatty is willing to take on this campaign and God will bless him for it. Aside from all of this, GU would do well to heed the teaching of the Catholic Church on the unforgivable sin against the Holy Spirit - final impenitence. Human beings are creatures of habit and to insist that you have the right to sin is a sure path to refusal to repent in the end. One needs only to read the horrifying account of Hell of the children of Fatima, not to wish that on anyone.
GU Student
Thu Nov 1 2012 01:30
Anonymous (Thu Nov 1 2012 00:13)

You have an impoverished, juvenile understanding of Roman Catholicism. You have been trained in solipsism, relativism, and rhetorical sophism. You cast aspersions with the smug assumption of self-righeousness. You have constructed a massive straw man and ruthlessly attacked it. Congratulations. Consider yourself properly indoctrinated.

Anonymous
Thu Nov 1 2012 00:13
Have you even stopped for a second and considered what truly constitutes Catholic identity? For me (and for the vast majority of Catholics), it means genuine concern and charity for the poor, engagement with even the most marginalized in society, and the ability to openly consider other ideas, so that one might grow in intellect and use this intellect to be closer to God.

I apologize, Mr. Blatty, if Georgetown does not overly concern itself with prevalence of the birth control that prevents needless suffering all over the world. Im sorry, Mr. Blatty, if your catholic church is one that requires rigid deference to an earthly and mortal authority figure, flying in the face of the very gospel of Jesus himself, who would have detested the papacy. I'm sorry, Mr. Blatty, that the Georgetown of today teaches that the most important aspect of cura personalis is finding oneself through an open dialogue, inspired by the very divine goal of intellectual growth.

You sir, are just like many who cling to narrow and rigid orthodoxy because it scares you to consider what might exist beyond. You are Lot's wife, turning to gaze lovingly on a pristine city that never was all that pristine after all...

Anonymous
Wed Oct 31 2012 15:41
I remember hearing that the reason some buildings lacked crucifixes was because some of the newer buildings were built with Federal funding (the ICC comes to mind). I think the Feds wanted to avoid a sparking a constitutional debate over separation of church & state and just made it a stipulation of the grants.

Anybody else heard something similar?

Tom (SFS'2012)

Anonymous
Wed Oct 31 2012 09:56
Georgetown is worse than a secular pagan college. It is a college that calls itself Catholic while being secular and pagan. Having "elements" of Catholic Identity and "elements" of other religions is a sign of worshiping the "diversity god", not the one true God. The Cardinal and the Pope need to flat out say this college can no longer call itself Catholic. Doing anything less is scandalizing souls.
GU Student
Wed Oct 31 2012 01:06
Anonymous, like the rest of the secular apologists, purposefully conflates "engagement" with advocacy. Pray tell, Anonymous, why Georgetown's administration fails to engage with the Church itself? Please reconcile your assertion that Georgetown engages all sides of a debate, ostensibly in the name of academic freedom, with an empirical record that does not merely suggest, but incontrovertibly proves that it shuns conservative, authentic Catholic voices. Please explain the necessity of covering up IHS at the request of a secular authority in the project of engagement. Please do the same for removing the crucifix from the classroom. Good luck with that. I don't expect a quality reply.
Anonymous
Tue Oct 30 2012 14:39
Need we forget that everything in life is a balance. Georgetown is a Catholic institution that also values engagement of ideas with others. The Atlantic celebrated President DeGioia as a "Brave Thinker." To attack the administration as not Catholic enough because they do not find their inspiration exclusively from the Gospel or other teachings cheapens what it means to be an institution of higher learning. Georgetown certainly maintains its Catholic identity through its teachings and many of its policies, but it also branches out to pursue the path that it feels is right.

In the Atlantic article Georgetown is praised in no uncertain terms. "DeGioia held fast to his decision, again casting his school as a sentinel for the free exchange of ideas-and reminding us why an institution like Georgetown exists in the first place." The Church should cherish the fact that a Catholic University is seen as a "sentinel for the free expression of ideas" rather than attack the administration for allowing a member of the US Cabinet to speak on campus.
---http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/11/john-degioia/309128/

Censorship of ideas is a step backwards. A Catholic University today walks the line between following strict and engaging with the rest of the world.

Anonymous
Tue Oct 30 2012 09:58
I'm a Catholic in the midwest and looking at colleges to consider for my son. I REALLY WANT a Catholic institution. . . exactly because the philosophy and theology of the Church are eminently reasonable.

So "being Catholic" is critical in the decision here. It's pretty clear that a good Catholic institution will follow the path of the Church and not whatever way it wanders into or opts/apes to follow.

CPC
Mon Oct 29 2012 11:27
Peter, Praise be to Jesus Christ, King of Endless Glory. The Father King Society is an example of the New Evangelization. "Take courage; get up, Jesus is calling you."
Sarah, Congratulations to you! Perhaps things are 'not as bad' as they appear. I hope Peter would be very interested in hearing experiences like yours as he moves forward. God Bless You.
In Him is Plentiful Redemption
Spiff
Sat Oct 27 2012 09:54
Absolutely, they should. The stones are hailing in their direction, and have been, for decades. Those who find the orthodoxies of Georgetown so should find an educational institution more in line with their own moral relativism.
The Dude
Fri Oct 26 2012 18:35
Was I the only one who did know Georgetown was Catholic before I arrived?

As for the Fluke controversy, one would feel more comfortable about GU's "Catholic" character had Jack come out in defense of the university's right to not pay for the birth control and abortions that Fluke demanded. Instead, he merely defended her.

A call to civility out of the President's mouth does not bother me. His silence in defense of Catholic doctrine does. And that's the issue for so many of us. Salt was of course thrown into the wounds by honoring the HHS Secretary with the opportunity to give a commencement address.

As Father Schall wrote: "Honoring the person who intends to shut one's institution down unless it conforms to laws that deny religious liberty and human intelligence seems, at best, dubious."

His article is here is in the Catholic World Report

Later on he writes . . .

"[Catholic colleges and universities like Georgetown] appear mostly indifferent to what has been probably the most unique of American legal innovations about the relation of religion and government. The Sebelius invitation, from the outside, seems an indifference to the Church by those who would be most expected to support her on the grounds of intelligence itself.

The issue is whether universities called "Catholic" have not become rather secular with vague religious symbols still about but no substantial connection with what it is to be Catholic in reason and intelligence. The bishops, for all their courage in facing this question, have not addressed the factual question about what is the actual orientation of universities that are called "Catholic" for whatever reason."

What Blatty proposes, one hopes, is to force the Church to address the question of GU being Catholic in name only. Georgetown's administration and President Jack likely don't want such a debate to happen because, if looked at honestly, the Bishops are likely to say Georgetown isn't being authentically Catholic.

The question then, is what is to be done? After all, the Church owns Georgetown, not the administration, nor faculty, nor the Jesuit community itself.

Sarah Murphy, Class of 2012
Fri Oct 26 2012 12:56
Mr. Blatty obviously had an extremely positive experience during his undergraduate Georgetown career. It sounds as if the Catholic identity of the university, particularly the Jesuit identity, shaped him profoundly. Unfortunately, Mr. Blatty's statement of issues with Georgetown does not consider the very thing that made him so attached to Georgetown in the first place: the religious experience of Georgetown students. While no two evolutions of religious beliefs are the same, I belief that my growth in Catholic faith was, like Mr. Blatty's, in large part due to the environment and dialogue that Georgetown fosters.
I am a Roman Catholic 2012 graduate of Georgetown College. I chose Georgetown University almost without considering its Jesuit identity. Little did I know how much Georgetown would affect my religious beliefs. In my time at Georgetown, I took Theology classes that concerned the Church both in the past and present. I learned where my religion came from and where it is today. Discussion of faith and organized religion permeated my English, government, classical studies, and art courses. Those discussions could never be purely academic; they often came from a place of truth deep inside me. My senior year, I, along with over 100 other seniors, elected to take a course called, "Jesuit Education." In this class, we could NOT shy away from taking an adult examination of our faith lives, an experience that my friends at other universities, even Catholic ones, never really had to do. Discussions about the class itself continued outside the classroom walls of our own volition, indicating to me the spiritual life, the hunger for truth and love, present on our campus.
This permeation of Catholic beliefs was not confined to the walls of ICC, Walsh, and White-Gravenor. Of course, like any "good" Catholic, I went to Mass every week at Dalgren Chapel. I participated in choir to a standing-room only congregation of my peers. What I felt in that chapel every week was something true, something holy. I felt that same truth when I saw friends working with Georgetown's pro-life group and creating opportunities for interreligious dialogue. When President DeGioia wrote a letter regarding the congressional testimony of a Georgetown Law student and its resulting backlash, I saw a university that recognized the difference between the open advocacy of faith and close-minded bickering. Georgetown taught me that I need to have a foundation to my beliefs; the strong foundation that my Georgetown education provided will help me weather any storms or crises of faith.
I am currently attending a secular graduate school. When I made my decision to attend, I knew it provided the best package for education; I was hesitant, however, to attend a non-Jesuit institution. Georgetown had helped me explore my faith; what if I became complacent, a Catholic going through the motions? The wonderful thing about a Jesuit college education is that it becomes an inherent part of its students. Georgetown University, with its emphasis on educated dialogue on faith, gave me the tools to better live the life we as Catholics are commanded to live. Mr. Blatty worries about how the "Catholic" identity of Georgetown is simply a façade. I cannot determine how Georgetown's fostering environment destroys that fundamental Catholic belief of the immense love God has for us and the love Jesus compels us to show to one another. In today's world, our generation is growing more afraid of organized religion and is turning instead to a "spiritual" life. Thank goodness Georgetown University helps its students oppose that trend. Because of the truths I learned at Georgetown, I am slowly learning exactly what it means to live "ad maiorem Dei gloriam" - for the greater glory of God.
Really?
Fri Oct 26 2012 12:36
"A Catholic university will defend academic freedom against the illiberal and intolerant new orthodoxies that allow no dissension from their new truths, as is happening at Georgetown today."

Those in illiberal and intolerant orthodoxies that allow no dissension shouldn't throw stones...





log out