GU Must Stop Force-Feeding Students Leo's Meal Plans

As more than 212 students across campus suffered the effects of the norovirus, many older students across were happy to be free from the demanding meal plan requirement forced upon freshmen and sophomores. Last week’s outbreak sheds light on a fundamentally unfair burden; It is time we allowed everyone, not just juniors and seniors, to decide whether or not they want to patronize Leo’s.

Underclassmen can choose between unlimited, 24, 14 or 10 meals a week but are restricted from buying block plans or opting out entirely. If a student chooses the 10-meal plan, he ends up paying more than $7.80 per meal. For the same amount of money, students could get a savory sandwich at Wisey’s, a Study Snacks meal at The Tombs or a healthy salad from SweetGreen.

By making meal plans mandatory for freshmen and sophomores, the university serves on a silver platter a monopoly to ARAMARK, the university’s food service provider. (The only time a silver platter and Leo’s have ever been associated.) Since underclassmen have no choice but to pay above-average prices for subpar meals, ARAMARK has little incentive to increase the quality of the food and lower the prices. Many students don’t frequent Leo’s because they genuinely want to; they go because they feel compelled to, since the meal has already been paid for.

Allowing all students to choose whether or not they want to buy meal plans would probably lower ARAMARK’s bottom line, at least in the short run, and it may make it less desirable for food service providers to bid on serving Georgetown. But it would also force ARAMARK or anyone else to evaluate what students want and make the substantive changes needed. If the dining hall truly starts to serve students, folks will start to eat there voluntarily.

The argument that eating at Leo’s gives freshmen the opportunity to socialize is fair; however, that argument assumes that freshmen will see friendly faces in the cafeteria and sit down with a spontaneously chosen group, an event which hardly ever occurs. In reality, most students go to Leo’s at a chosen time with specific people, or they sit alone. And this can be done just as easily and more comfortably at The Tombs or other restaurants.

Some may argue that students who live in dorms need meal plans because they can’t prepare their own meals. But in dorms, students have access to a stove, oven and kitchen sink in each common room and a small fridge in their rooms, the same facilities that students in Village B have at their disposal. Dorms are not so fundamentally different from apartments that dorm inhabitants should not have the right to cook a majority of their meals.

There will always be students who will choose to have Leo’s plans, whether they are freshmen or seniors. Some students turn to Leo’s for convenience, the opportunity to run into friends and their weekly fix of chicken fingers. But those of us who need or want to save some money or would just rather walk the extra two blocks for a Chicken Madness and a Snapple should be given the choice to do so.

THE HOYA has revamped its blogs. Check out our sports blog, newsroom blog and neighborhood blog here.

The mean plan situation definitely gives ARAMARK and Leo's an incentive to suck.

Again, Margie Bryant runs this food service area of the University. Can someone from The Hoya PLEASE contact her and try pulling a decent explanation from her for her policies? No one has ever gotten an answer for why these sorts of policies exist, and so nothing is ever done about it.

I think it's probably a good thing to make a meal plan obligatory for freshman. Whereas it's true that people tend to eat meals with people they know, making sure everyone winds up in the same environment has some positive effects. I'm pretty sure that it's been scientifically proven that groups of people who undergo torture together are more likely to share close social bonds.

Wake up! The university makes money on the meal plans as well! Saying ARAMARK has a monopoly on the one dining hall on campus is saying that the Epicurian serves gourmet food. Thanks to ARAMARK and the University we have a newely renovated dining hall on campus that did not exist in prior years. You would also be hard pressed to find a better deal then $7 and change for all you can eat.

Wow. I am truly amazed. The Hoya wrote a coherent editorial. Bravo.

Requiring freshmen to purchase meal plans is fairly new; when I was a freshman, I had a block meal plan first semester, and no mean plan second semester. The university switched the policy while I was an undergrad in order to increase revenues. This was controversial at the time, but the university was open about it, and admitted that the reason was revenue.

My sophomore year was the year they made it mandatory for sophomores. I had a note from my doctor saying that I had to be extra careful about how food was prepared (ingreedients in everything) and that she recommeded that I cook my own food. The university would not accept this (because they clearly note the ingreedients in each dish they prepare - a complete lie) and still made me get a meal plan.

Post new comment

Comments which are spam, off-topic, abusive, use excessive foul language or promote hate or bias will be deleted.

Anonymous comments will be held for moderation. This may take some time, so we recommend you create a free account.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <li>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.