Former Professor Accused of Doubling as Cuban Spy
Gillian Gunn Clissold’s academic career resembles that of the many professors and researchers truly dedicated to their area of study.
During her 10 years at Georgetown, almost six of which were spent as director of the Caribbean Project within the university’s Center for Latin American Studies, she was considered one of the leading American experts on Cuba, having traveled to the island nation almost once a year for 14 years.
But recent reports have accused Gunn of being more than academically interested in Cuba — a U.S. colonel has named her as a spy for the Cuban government. Gunn has denied the allegation, calling it “preposterous.”
Lt. Col. Chris Simmons, a retired U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency counterintelligence officer and active lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army Reserves, appeared on a Spanish-language television show in Miami three weeks ago. On the show, he named four people, including Gunn, as spies for the Cuban government. According to The Miami Herald, the other three Simmons named have been accused as spies before, but Gunn has never before been accused of working with Cuban intelligence.
In the course of his investigation, Simmons said he worked with a former Cuban officer who specializes in identifying academic spies in the United States. He said he also utilized declassified records and additional interviews in reaching his conclusion.
Simmons said that Gunn was not a spy in the traditional sense, but that she was what is called a spy of influence.
“The way [the unnamed Cuban officer’s] section worked academics was they would find sympathetic academics and provide them with opportunities to visit Cuba and [have] access to the highest government officials,” he told THE HOYA. “In exchange, [the academics] would discuss their meetings with U.S. government officials in an effort to change U.S. policy.”
Simmons said he is making these allegations as a private citizen, and he emphasized that his views do not reflect the views of the federal government. He added that he conducts his research primarily through his company, the Cuban Intelligence Research Center, which is located in Leesburg, Va.
Gunn countered that the very intimate nature of her research makes her an easy target for such accusations.
“Anyone who works on Cuba in depth and has higher-level access on both sides is vulnerable to those accusations,” she said. “It’s preposterous, and I’m really sick of it.”
Gunn said that she is used to these sorts of allegations, having been named a spy for the American government by current Cuban head of state Raúl Castro.
“I started working on controversial issues when I was about 22. I quit when I was 47 or 48. If you have a thin skin, it’s going to get to you. It comes with the territory,” she said.
Something that caught Simmons’ eye in his investigation was the Cuba Project, an organization that was set up at Georgetown by Gunn in 1992. Gunn said it was a group that brought together academics, government officials and sometimes journalists to talk about the political situation in Cuba.
“It was a study group that brought together academics and government people for off-the-record discussions about situations in Cuba, and occasionally discussions would wander into U.S. policy, but that was not the primary purpose,” she said.
Simmons argued that Gunn used the group to provide the Cuban government with possible sympathetic students. He said that that’s how Ana Belen Montes, a former analyst for the DIA who was convicted in 2002 of conspiracy to commit espionage and sentenced to 25 years in prison, was lured to the life of a spy.
“[For] every Georgetown student, every other college student that was a part of the Cuba Project, Dr. Gunn would have been responsible for providing their names and biographical info to Cuba,” he said.
Andy Pino, director of Georgetown media relations, said that while the matter remains unresolved, it does not affect the reputation of the university in any way.
“The basis of the allegations against Gillian Gunn Clissold remains unclear,” he said. “[She] is no longer affiliated with the university.”
Gunn left Georgetown in 2002 when the Caribbean Project moved to Trinity University and served as its associate director of Trinity’s Programs in International Affairs. She is now retired from academia and is working as a horse trainer in Virginia.








Mark Lance
Aside from the "allegation" that she provided public information -- names of students enrolled in a program -- to the Cuban government, the charge here is the following:
“The way [the unnamed Cuban officer’s] section worked academics was they would find sympathetic academics and provide them with opportunities to visit Cuba and [have] access to the highest government officials,” he told THE HOYA. “In exchange, [the academics] would discuss their meetings with U.S. government officials in an effort to change U.S. policy.”
So if these "charges" are true, some academics met with Cuban officials, and then met with US government officials and expressed their views.
Perhaps everyone involved needs to consult a dictionary and look up "spying". This is what we call an exchange of ideas. The idea that this has anything to do with spying is absurd, Orwellian. It would certainly appear that the whole point is to cast into doubt any disagreement with US government policy regarding Cuba.
To the editor:
A US Army lieutenant colonel (LTC) would be referred to as a “colonel” and not as a “lieutenant,” the latter implying a much lower rank. I refer to the following excerpt from above:
"...a U.S. lieutenant has named her as a spy..."
Now that LTC Simmons has his due respect, I want to point out that he is acting unprofessionally. To spy "not in the traditional sense" but "by influence" could be considered participating in espionage - however, creating a media spectacle is the wrong way to accuse someone of such a crime, and goes against the principled approach of which a professional such as the LTC should be aware. In order to prevent innocent people from defamation, only the appropriate authorities should be contacted with reports of suspicious activity, who will then investigate and often determine the accusations to be false, thus sparing the innocent from having their reputations and lives ruined.
Mark,
I think what you've pointed out is flawed reporting, not necessarily a flawed charge against this professor. The "missing fact" in the story is what the professor was telling the US Government on the Cuban government's request. For example, if the professor just returned from her trip and then asked to meet with her congressman to tell him how beautiful Cuba's beaches are or how efficiently their trains operate, then I'd agree, there's no "spying." However, if the professor is taking cues from the Cubans to spread false or misleading information about, say, the presence of weapons in Cuba ("those weren't missile silos, those were CORN silos.") then it seems to me it is spying.
Bottom line: I agree that based on the reporting it's unclear what the professor did wrong, but it seems that you've assumed that the ambiguity is being used to hide the innocence of the professor.
Mark Lance
Arvid:
Just saw this post, and you probably won't be reading here again, but I don't see how what you describe would be spying. It might be some form of illegal "working as an agent of a foreign government", but spying involves passing classified US information to others, not passing on foreign propaganda. I can't actually see what the issue would be even with what you say. I mean if the professor lied, then that is wrong, but I can't imagine the US government taking the word of a professor obviously supportive of the Cuban regime on a matter like this. (Well, given some of the "evidence" they claim to have believed about Iraq, maybe, but you get the point.)
Post new comment