Fellowships Provide Equal Opportunities
In her column (“Students Must Ensure the Future of Feminism at GU,” THE HOYA, April 18, 2004, A3), Emily Liner writes: “a few female students have told me that they have felt uncomfortable in the competition for fellowship nominations on campus, but I could never get them to talk to me because they were afraid that the Office of Fellowships would reprimand them.” Lest this unsupported innuendo discourage women from applying for fellowships in the future, let me offer a few statistics:
In the last four years, Georgetown students have won three Rhodes Scholarships, and two of our three Georgetown Rhodes winners have been women.
Georgetown students have won 11 George J. Mitchell scholarships since 2001, and four of the 11 were women.
This year we had 45 students apply for the Fulbright Program, and 27 of these students were recommended to the country. Fifteen of these 27 students were undergraduates; nine of the 15 are women. To date, four undergraduate women and three undergraduate men have been selected as Fulbright scholars.
Applying for these fellowships is not easy. There is no guarantee of success no matter how hard one tries. There are simply not enough fellowships for the number of talented students graduating each year in the United States. However, the statistics show that women are doing just as well as men, and these numbers are consistent throughout the 20-plus fellowships we oversee.
Just to clarify, we seek out and encourage talented and ambitious women and men to apply for the wide range of fellowships.
Carolyn Emigh
Associate Director, Office of Fellowships
April 24, 2008







Translation into modern Hoya-speak: there is no problem with diversity re: women and fellowship nominations on campus. This serves as yet another example of how Emily Liner and her ever-present anonymous friends offer little more than "unsupported [self-loathing] innuendo," thereby doing a disservice to both the Hoya and the women of Georgetown's campus. Feminism and diversity may well be important issues on campus, but, despite Emily's recent admonitions (and long-awaited swan song), it becomes a trifle when thrown about haphazardly (e.g., compare burning bras to mardi gras). Thus, this is yet another instance wherein Emily Liner--and, let's be honest, the entire Hoya Ed Board--needed to pick their battles a little more carefully.
Bring back Nick T.,
Joe
Joe:
What are you talking about? What is your issue with the Hoya's ed board in relation to this column or this letter? Is your point that the newspaper should not have run a feminist column? Or it should have censored this one? Or that it should not have run a letter in response to the column because you think we're over saturated with stories about people that are not white men?
I don't know what your relationship to Nick T was, but you don't need to sign every comment with "Bring back Nick T."
Post new comment