$800,000 In Club Funds Unspent

While many groups have been denied requests for additional funding, more than $800,000 in unspent funds for student clubs has accumulated in university reserve accounts.

The extra funds are sitting in the reserve accounts of six advisory boards: the Student Activities Commission, Georgetown Program Board, Media Advisory Board, Performing Arts Advisory Council, Center for Social Justice Advisory Board and Advisory Board for Club Sports. The accounts are meant to cover losses in the event that a student organization it funds runs a deficit.

As of February, SAC had $250,006 in reserve funds, the largest amount of the six boards. The media board had the second-largest balance with $220,000. Club sports held the smallest balance with only $15,441.

Many club leaders have been looking for increased funding from their respective boards in the past years while $800,000 has accumulated in reserves without being allocated for use.

“It is a major issue when that much money is tied up and things do go unfunded,” said Zack Bluestone (SFS ’09), chair of GUSA’s Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee. “The funding boards do need reserves. But not all of them need as much as they have right now.”

According to Erika Cohen-Derr, director of student programs, there are a number of reasons contributing to the high reserve funds.

“It’s just the reality of budgeting,” she said. “If organizations are not coming up with programs deemed worthy of funds, then a funding board might not allocate the money.”

Sometimes boards allocate money to a certain event, but if the event never takes place, the allocated money is returned, Cohen-Derr said.

Eden Schiffmann (COL ’08), speaker of the student association's senate and former member of THE HOYA’s Editorial Board, said that the senate is concerned with the relatively high amount of reserves.

“A lot of money is just sitting around, and it can do a lot of good,” Schiffmann said. “It is our firm belief that this amount of money should not be allowed to sit in these accounts.”

The GUSA Finance and Appropriations Committee plans to meet with the six advisory boards on Wednesday to develop a budget to appropriate funds to the boards for the upcoming academic year.

Cohen-Derr said the meeting will center around developing a strategy that addresses the reserve fund balances.

“Everybody knows this is a high priority to address,” she said.
“The senate will not pass any budget without solving the reserve funds,” Schiffmann said. “The number-one issue is to make sure student finances are on track.”

Schiffmann said the Finance and Appropriations Committee has requested that each of the six boards complete a proposal, to be turned in during Wednesday’s meeting, explaining whether the respective board should or should not spend its reserves.

GUSA has been considering a number of solutions to reduce the size of the reserve funds.

“We’re looking at having the reserve boards spend it down. Where there have been cutbacks in the past, they can spend more, or they can spend more on capital,” Bluestone said.

Schiffmann said that some ideas include having a central reserve for all six of the boards or even putting money in the underperforming student activities endowment.

“It’s going to be a challenge, but everyone agrees something has to be done,” he said.

After the student body voted to pass the Accountability and Reform Amendment in October 2006, GUSA was given full audit and control powers over the Finance and Appropriations Committee.

In January of each year, the Finance and Appropriations Committee, which consists of seven GUSA senators and six external advisors, develops a budget that appropriates funds to the six advisory boards for the next fiscal year, which begins and ends in June. At Wednesday’s meeting, the committee plans to pass a budget, and on April 14, the GUSA Senate is slated to vote on the proposal.

Upon approval, the funds are turned over to the six advisory boards represented on the committee, which then allocate the funds to Georgetown student organizations.

“Sometimes the budget gets tight,” said Laurance Cosper (SFS ’09), vice president of the Muslim Students Association. “I think that money that SAC doesn’t use in the reserve should then be spread out to different programs.”

The Georgetown University College Democrats usually gets the funding it needs, according to its president, Adam Feiler (SFS ’09). Feiler added, though, that he does not believe that SAC needs such a large balance in the reserve account.

“We have a good relation with SAC and [it] usually meets all of our needs and obligations for financing our events,” Feiler said. “It is a difficult thing to understand why there is a large surplus. We understand, but we respectfully disagree.”

2008 is not the first year that the different boards have accumulated large reserve funds. In June 2004, SAC had more than $180,000 and the total has continued to grow since then, reaching $276,711 in June 2007.

“This issue comes up from year to year,” Cohen-Derr said. “This is the first year we are dedicating more to this problem.”

Chairpersons of advisory boards with larger reserve funds said they are going to try to reduce the amount of reserves.

SAC Chair Sophia Behnia (COL ’09) said SAC dipped into its reserve fund to take out $40,000 this year after over-allocating funds but that the amount of money in the reserve fund is still quite significant.

“We do need to work to spend it down,” she said.

SAC plans to spend some reserve money remodeling SAC’s Leavey Center offices, she said, as well as build more storage for different SAC programs.

According to Molly Keogh (SFS ’08), chair of the CSJ advisory board, the center has been trying to spend down its reserve, but has been unable to do so.

“In the past year, we have spent [reserve funds] on training of groups, sending student leaders to conferences,” she said. “CSJ has had, at least for the last year and a half, a plan for spending the contingency fund.”

Records indicate that the board’s reserve total has taken a recent dip starting in June 2007 after increasing every year from 2003 to 2007. Keogh added that, considering its rapid expansion in recent years, the board will be able to spend its reserve funds and reach the target reserve amount of $77,000. As of February, the account held $140,630.

But some chairpersons of advisory boards with smaller reserve funds felt differently.

GBP Chair Jackie Mendez (SFS ’09) said that the board’s $47,509 reserve account balance is necessary in case of emergencies.

“Costs are rising, so GPB needs more money to catch up,” she said, indicating that hosting a concert currently costs at least $50,000. “We definitely hope to get more [appropriated money],” she said.

The Advisory Board for Club Sports has been running short on funding, according to Chairman-Elect Nick Calta (COL ’10). As the youngest board, created in 2003, it has $15,441 in a reserve account. Schiffmann said, though, that GUSA has tripled the funding for club sports.

“We are always close to running a deficit,” Calta said. “We’re trying to build our reserve. It is much smaller than it should be.”

Fr. Eric Zimmer, S.J., who serves as chair of the Media Advisory Board, and Ron Lignelli, managing director of the Program in the Performing Arts, declined to comment.

- Editor's Note: The original version of this article was posted on April 3, 2008 at 5:15 a.m.

This is why SAC and other groups need to be brought under some more accountability to students whether it is via GUStudent Assoc. or somehow else, it needs to be done because right now they aren't elected or even appointed by the student body they just choose themselves. Kudos that we are finding out about this via the audit but I hope that these boards really will be held accountable for making sure that this student money is actually spent on students. I can see why some reserves are good -- but $800,000??? There must be some redundancy there.

That's a whole lot of money that could be put to good use. What about a spring concert with free GUGS? That would go a long way towards making this all better...

Reserve funds should be capped at no more than 10% of the budget they get allocated every year.

There's a big problem about the funding process in general if funding boards think they need a few hundred thousand dollars -- in SAC's case, more than they receive each year in funds to spend - in case of emergency. What emergency justifies that? The Leavey Center burning down?

Let's not forget that these reserve funds were built up by the funding boards UNDERSPENDING the amount of money they were given each year. And from the looks of it -- underspending by tens of thousands of dollars year in and year out. All this while clubs complain about getting the short-shrift when it comes to getting funds to plan and host events.

There's already $44,000 in general reserve funds set up as a catch-all rainy day fund for all the groups to dip in. If there isn't an emergency, it can be allocated for a big project at the end of the year. Beyond that, funding boards should never need more to dip in to than 10% of their funds. In the case of SAC, it would be around $20,000, in case they have a particularly awful year.

$250,000 could have gotten us GUTS buses running every two minutes 24 hours on the weekends years ago.

Let's spend these funds on projects all students want -- increasing wireless routers around campus, the innovative GUSA Summer Fellows Program that gives free summer housing to a select number of students working unpaid, non-profit or public sector internships, a $15,000 Club Fund that GUSA would administer, so if a club is denied funding by SAC for an event, they can come to their democratically-elected Senators for the money.

The possibilities are endless. It's time to end the misuse of nearly $1 million and put it into good hands -- the students'.

Some of those funds are being held for a GUTV studio, possibly in New South, when the university is ready to invest in the program as an academic department, much like they already did with theatre. The first step was in the Fall of 2006 with a course called Video Production, taught by Prof. Estel Dillon with the assistance of the Station and General Managers of GUTV at the time, myself and Eric Strauss. That actually got off the ground with a donation from an alumna who works for MSNBC.

Wait, GUTV is going to get its own TV studio? Has anyone seen the garbage they are broadcasting. And yet Philodemic, IRC, and other clubs get the shaft yearly by receiving inadequate funding despite winning awards? Doesn't make much sense to me.

Joe Hoya,

It is because GUTV brings home the bacon to the tune of $20K on a good year from production and DVD sales of graduation, senior week, NSO, etc. So GUTV is in effect funding other organizations and has no doubt been a big contributor to the surplus.

As for the programming, I know there's plenty of good stuff in the archives that's ready for the air and we had the capability of 24 hour programming, too. I just wish more people would have been interested in the production of new programs, both on and off camera. For those who were interested in TV/film production, GUTV was a great resource to start their career, and I'm glad to have helped them pursue that, though I chose to pursue something entirely different myself.

Joe Hoya (if that is your real name),

Are you kidding me? Over the past two years, all requests made by Philodemic have been approved with the exception of a single event that didn't fulfill their group's purpose. Your other example, IRC, receives more student money than any other SAC group with the exception of Lecture Fund. Just because they complain about the amount of money they receive doesn't mean that it's too little. It's like a rich spoiled brat complaining that she only got a Corvette instead of a Ferrari.

Post new comment

Comments which are spam, off-topic, abusive, use excessive foul language or promote hate or bias will be deleted.

Anonymous comments will be held for moderation. This may take some time, so we recommend you create a free account.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.