Library Renewal Overdue, Some Say

Although wireless Internet upgrades at Lauinger Library were expected to take effect by the spring semester, the installation of the new network remains incomplete, just one of several library services with which students and Lauinger employees have expressed frustration.
Electrical outlets, lighting, study space and online services have been characterized as inadequate as the university looks to upgrade its aging library facility.
While University Information Services recently began work to improve wireless access on the second floor of Lauinger last month, students say that wireless Internet access remains spotty.
Scott Rossow (GRD ’09) described the problem of locating and keeping a wireless signal on his laptop as “interminable.”
University Librarian Artemis Kirk said that more wireless improvements are on the way.
“University Information Systems is working with us on improved wireless access and they expect to complete a major renovation project soon,” she said. “Some people have already noticed improvement in their access.”
In addition to Internet access, students looking to plug in their laptops for general use have encountered a slew of broken outlets.
Currently, 16 of the 72 electrical outlets in the only section of cubicles on the fourth floor with individual outlet access do not work, accounting for one whole row.
“Some of the cubes don’t have power at all on the fourth floor,” Emily Kolodner (MSB ’08) said.
Kirk said that the library’s administration recognizes the shortcomings with the library’s outlets.
“We have installed a number of power outlets on the seating floors of the library. They are still not completely adequate, and we know that the electrical capacity of the library is limited,” she said.
She said that students have frequently complained about inadequate lighting in the library. “The lighting can’t be fixed without a complete overhaul, but we have purchased lamps that can be checked out from the circulation desk and used anywhere in the library,” Kirk said.
Electrical difficulties are just part of the problem for the 38-year old structure that has seen an increase in the student body over the years.
Melissa Bell (MSB ’11) said that lack of space deters her from studying in Lauinger.
“During finals, it was really crowded,” she said. “I tried to stay in my room or Leavey as much as possible.”
Monica Munn (SFS ’09) said that finding a space at a table with access to outlets can be a challenge.
“If you want to do group work, it’s difficult,” she said.
According to Kirk, the space constraint poses a challenge that the administration has tried to address more creatively.
“It’s not ideal, but in the middle of each semester through the end of exams, we arrange to have six classrooms opened in Healy Hall for late night study,” she said. “Thanks to willing student workers, the registrar’s office, and the officers in [the Department of Public Safety], we have been able to provide group, quiet and silent study spaces to augment Lauinger.”
The Lauinger Web site offers an apology for ongoing technological upgrades of the GEORGE catalog. “We are currently upgrading our library systems,” it says. “Some of the screens in the GEORGE catalog may not display correctly during this time. Please bear with us as we address these issues.”
According to Craig Sallinger, an access and technical services specialist at Lauinger, these improvements should cause minimal inconvenience.
“They are tweaking how it looks when you check out a book online and what you are able to do there. It should not affect the actual process of checking out a book,” he said.
Still, Nancy Lucchese, who works at the reference desk on the third floor, defended Lauinger as one of the best libraries she has worked at, but still acknowledged its inadequacies. She said she must frequently respond to student complaints about the slowness of the printers just a few yards from her desk. Students working on any of the computers on the floor can send files to print on one of two printers, and often four or five students will gather around one backed-up printer, she said.
“We have tons of printing problems,” Lucchese said. “They take a lot of wear and tear, and they break down.”
Georgetown is also a member of the Association of Research Libraries, a non-profit organization of research libraries. The association makes annual assessments of member institutions based on collections, expenditures, staffing and service activities. In the most recent ranking, out of the 113 libraries surveyed, Georgetown ranked 46th, Kirk said.
Yet for some, including Rachel Cohen (COL ’09), the library’s electronic offerings are not adequate for students studying government. Cohen said that Congressional Quarterly and Roll Call are “must-reads” for those interested in government, especially interns on Capitol Hill.
“Though Lauinger receives paper copies of these publications, this is an inconvenient and frankly unrealistic way to offer students access to these resources,” she said. Cohen started a Facebook group called “Get Lauinger Out of the Stone Age — SUBSCRIBE TO CQ AND ROLL CALL!,” which currently has 17 members.
“Though a number of students have petitioned Lauinger to add online subscriptions to CQ and Roll Call, and though I have left messages with the appropriate bibliographers, I have heard no response,” she said.
Lucchese said that she finds Lauinger’s services, including its electronic databases, such as LexisNexis and JSTOR, impressive, although she said that relatively few students take advantage of the databases.
“Maybe they take it for granted or don’t see the value of it,” she said.








The reality is that the 'Georgetown University' that comissioned the building of the libary in the 60s was nothing like (in terms of prestige, funds, or outlook) the Georgetown University of today. For its time, Lauinger was a huge achievement for Georgetown - a very good University library along the lines of a 'strong regional' university.
The rise of Georgetown in the 80s (and it really didn't happen until the 80s) into the club of National Research University happened with bad timing, from the perspective of Lauinger's construction: Georgetown's increasing prominence and concomitant increased expectations from peers / students / faculty wern't matched by a library that had been comissioned in the hazy 'regional years' of the 1960s.
Today, Georgetown is making efforts to move from being a 'new guy' in the National Research Club into an established player. (The biggest thing holding us back is the Science Funding and Facilities, but I digress). Part of that solidification into the upper-tier establishment is going to have to involve, at some time or another, the construction of a new library.
When will this happen? I don't know. It probably could have been justified from a demand perspective (though not necessarily a financing one) well within the decade of the 90s. Anything that they do now with Lauinger is, simply put, a stopgap measure. Personally, although I know it's necessary to 'at least keep up', it kills me to see ANY money being put into Lauinger upgrades because of the background reality that a new library must be built.
My hopes are 2: 1) That serious discussions of this nature are already taking place - with a realistic timeline being developed, and, 2) When plans for a new library are comissioned and executed, they are for a building that will anticipated continued future ascendancy by the University, and that will remain with the school for generations, not a handful of decades. As Georgetown's permanence in the upper echelon of schools becomes solidified, we'll need a library that matches.
To the Editor:
I write to thank The Hoya and our students for their interest in the Lauinger Library (Tuesday’s article 1/15/08). We fully understand the frustrations that our users can experience, especially when space and seating are limited in contrast to the extraordinary use of our building. However, please permit me to clarify some points and correct a few misconceptions in the article:
1. The new UIS Lauinger Library network improvement project that began in mid-December is extensive: there have been construction workers and network engineers working in every corner of the building. When the project is completed in early February, all network equipment and some of the existing wiring will be replaced. The result will include a state-of-the-art wireless capability. We are grateful to UIS for their efforts to improve network and wireless access to Lauinger.
2. All of the outlets on the fourth floor carrels are now working; a circuit breaker had been switched off, possibly during a phase of our network upgrade project.
3. Our printers receive very heavy use, particularly at the beginning of each semester when students print very large course readings that require high resolution. At such peak times, printing can slow down, and I believe it was these situations to which our reference librarian referred. This year we will be installing new printers that should help during peak usage. In addition to the improved printers, we’ll be adding a new feature that allows users to print directly from their own laptops.
4. By now, users of Facebook will have seen our librarian’s posting that we do indeed receive both Roll Call http://www.rollcall.com/ and CQ Weekly http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/ in digital form, and have for some time. Please ask at the Reference Desk or online at if you are unable to locate a resource.
5. Georgetown’s library is a development partner with a prominent library systems vendor and we are preparing to release a new GEORGE catalog interface called Encore on January 22, 2008. Some of the displays, though not the functionality, of GEORGE were altered during this development phase. Please watch for the debut of Encore next week.
Finally, we always seek to improve our services and welcome your feedback. Please stop by or send your comments to:
http://www.library.georgetown.edu/webmaster/web.htm
Sincerely,
Artemis G. Kirk
University Librarian
İ Like Thehoya thanks youdizi izle haber program indir Şehitler ölmez güzel sözler
Post new comment