Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Tuition Set to Rise 3.5 Percent

Hoya Staff Writer

Published: Monday, February 13, 2012

Updated: Thursday, February 16, 2012 14:02

garf 1

ERICA RABINOVICH/THE HOYA

The total cost of undergraduate tuition, room, board and fees will increase by 3.2 percent between fiscal years 2012 and 2013, the steepest rise since 2009.

Undergraduate tuition will rise 3.5 percent to $42,360 this coming year, according to the university's latest financial plan.

The increase from the current rate of $40,920 per year is the largest percentage change in tuition since 2009, when tuition increased 5.5 percent. The Financial Plan 2013-2016 projects a 3.5 percent tuition increase each year through 2016.

According to university spokeswoman Stacy Kerr, the increased costs are largely due to the new expenses associated with the operation of Regents Hall, which is set to open this summer.

Including tuition, room, board and fees, an undergraduate education will cost $55,640 in fiscal year 2013, a 3.2 percent increase from this year's $53,910.

All room rates will increase about 2 percent, although the cost of living in a townhouse is set to increase by over 11 percent in fiscal year 2013 due to a new policy that will charge townhouse residents for utilities as part of their room rates instead of as a separate charge.

Graduate tuition will increase by 3.5 percent in fiscal year 2013, while tuition for the Masters in Business Administration program will increase by 4 percent. School of Continuing Studies rate increases range from 3 to 4.5 percent.

Georgetown was the most expensive university among its peer institutions in 2009 but has retreated to the middle of the pack since then. The university's total costs of living have grown an average of 2.7 percent between fiscal years 2009 and 2012 while its peer institutions have raised costs by a collective average of 4.3 percent.

Still, some students believe that the university's tuition increases are unfair. Joseph Vithayathil (COL '12) recommends that Georgetown adopt The George Washington University's fixed tuition policy, which prevents tuition hikes from affecting already enrolled students. GWU students pay tuition at the rate that was charged when they enrolled throughout their time at the university.

"They should go with GWU and lock in the same rate for the next four years. You don't have to worry about a 5 percent increase next year," he said.

Georgetown will also increase available need-based financial aid by $1.9 million in fiscal year 2013, $4.7 million in 2014, $6.5 million in 2015 and $5.6 million in 2016.

More than 40 percent of undergraduates, about 2,800 students, receive financial aid each year, according to the university.

"While tuition everywhere is rising, Georgetown is still making an unprecedented commitment to meet full demonstrated financial need," Kerr said.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

10 comments

Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 23:10
the graph does not need to be accurate - it's not a PhD dissertation. it is meant to show how much tuition has increased, and it does that with the numbers. anything that would make it accurate (adding a y axis and putting a break in it, or making the books proportional to the numbers) would make it look silly. what's really silly though, is this comment argument
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 21:16
I know. I'm not an idiot. It's called an implied assumption. I guess I have to spell it out for the blowhards among us. There is only one way this graph could be accurate. That would be if it had a break in the Y axis. The graph does not have a Y axis, and therefore cannot and does not have a break in the Y axis. Therefore the graph is inaccurate and misleading.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 21:04
There is no y axis. go back to your econometrics homework
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 15:58
If it had one of those squiggly lines on the Y axis indicating a break in the axis, it would be fine. But it doesn't.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 10:49
what do you want from the graph? a one "book" change every year. Sure that'd be more visually accurate but it would also look terrible. we readers are mildly intelligent, we can read the numbers. I don't think anyone thought tuition has tripled since 2008 when they looked at the graph
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 09:14
1) Even though it's allegedly inevitable, it's still worth complaining about. Complaining does help-in fact, students' and families' complaints have reached ears in the White House. If you watched the President's State of the Union address, you would have heard that he is putting pressure on universities to stop raising tuition.
2) I agree, this graph is incredibly misleading. That's just bad journalism, and I expect better from The Hoya.
Matt Hoyt
Wed Feb 15 2012 15:14
That's an EXTREMELY misleading graph. Yes, there have been increases. But look at the scale! It makes a 7k increase look as big as 47K (just compare the high of the first bar with the total height of changes). It's a graph meant to mislead...not that I'm sticking up for the school, though.
Anonymous
Wed Feb 15 2012 12:25
People freak out when the tuition increases just like they freak out with Facebook changes. It's going to happen, and it's going to keep happening. Yeah, it's not ideal, but there's really nothing you can do about it and complaining doesn't help.
Anonymous
Wed Feb 15 2012 11:48
GU Alum here with two little kids I'm saving college funds for. Yikes. I loved attending Gtown, but I'm hoping they choose UVA.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 14 2012 11:03
Cool graph. That's quite in increase over 5 years






log out