Term Half Done, Ambitions Half Fulfilled

By Elizabeth Rowe | Oct 06 2009 | GUSA |
GUSA President Calen Angert, right, and Vice President Jason Kluger, left, have delivered on some campaign promises and continued to work toward others.
GUSA President Calen Angert, right, and Vice President Jason Kluger, left, have delivered on some campaign promises and continued to work toward others.
File photo: Elizabeth Lawton/The Hoya

Seven months after emerging victorious from a messy election, the chief executives of the Georgetown University Student Association have fulfilled a number of their campaign objectives; halfway through their terms, however, Calen Angert (MSB ’11) and Jason Kluger (MSB ’11) have some goals left to achieve.

Angert, the GUSA president, and Kluger, the vice president, have delivered on pledges to make the MBNA Career Education Center more useful to students and to involve students in programs designed to bolster campus safety. Their commitments to developing academic life and establishing a new source of funding for clubs remain ongoing projects.

Angert and Kluger ran on a platform that stressed reform at the Career Education Center, improvement in student safety on campus, the creation of a fund to provide financing to student groups unable to get money from the Student Activities Commission and greater GUSA involvement in student intellectual life.

The two were elected in March in a run-off election against Jeff Lamb (MSB ’10) and Molly Breen (MSB ’11). Lamb and Breen were disqualified from the election by the GUSA Election Commission for violating poster policies, but were reinstated by GUSA’s Constitutional Council.

Angert and Kluger have focused heavily on the Career Education Center, which the candidates told The Hoya in February was the most important issue of their campaign. They have helped to establish an LSAT familiarization course for students, worked to put career services on social networking sites and helped to increase access for students who previously felt “alienated” by the Career Education Center, Angert said.

In light of a series of similar sexual assaults and break-ins — as well as other unrelated crimes — Angert and Kluger have worked to certify students to drive SafeRides vehicles, starting as early as next week.

“We just got a ton of people certified to drive SafeRides, and the program should be launching soon,” Angert said. “We’ve cleared all the legal hurdles, and now we’re working with [the Department of Public Safety] to start driving as soon as possible.”

Despite meeting with neighborhood residents early in their term, however, Angert and Kluger have been unable to protect students from severe 61D noise violations issued by the Metropolitan Police Department, one of their stated campaign goals. Six such citations, which result in arrests on violators’ records, have been issued so far this academic year, compared to none last academic year.

Angert declined to comment on this issue.

“We worked over the summer and into this year meeting with students who are concerned, administrators, the neighborhood and even the police,” Kluger said. “We’re trying to get a grasp on all of the relevant information to put together a campaign.”

After the Wisconsin Avenue Safeway closed in April and 93 percent of surveyed students agreed that a new bus route was needed, Angert and Kluger worked to establish Saturday GUTS bus service to the Safeway in Rosslyn, Va. This route began operating Sept. 19.

Angert and Kluger also hoped to establish a “Georgetown Fund” that would allocate money for student clubs outside of the SAC funding process. The fund is still in its planning stages.

Angert and Kluger declined to release numbers related to the Georgetown Fund.

As candidates, Angert and Kluger pledged to address diversity on campus, an issue Angert has previously worked with as a member of the GUSA Senate and Executive Cabinet.

GUSA has been incorporated into all of the diversity working groups that have been created in the last year and all members of the GUSA Executive Branch will receive diversity training.

“However, diversity isn’t really something that you would place on a checklist. These types of issues require lots of dialogue, and understanding is really the best outcome. In that sense, I think we’ve accomplished a ton,” Angert said.

But not everyone agrees that GUSA is the best mechanism for effecting change in the realm of diversity.

“It doesn’t seem like that’s his number-one priority,” GUSA senator and former Hoya staff writer Johnny Solis (SFS ’11) said of Angert’s work regarding campus diversity.

Solis said he plans to join the Student Commission for Unity because he does not feel that he has any more leverage as a GUSA senator than he does as a member of Georgetown’s general student population.

“It still seems like the administration does not take GUSA seriously, particularly the senate,” he said.

During the campaign, Angert and Kluger said they wanted to examine intellectual life at Georgetown and use GUSA as a catalyst for boosting interactions between students and professors outside the classroom.

“We wish to promote closer ties with professors through GUSA-sponsored initiatives run outside the classroom,” Angert told The Hoya in February.

No substantive progress has been made thus far by the Angert administration.

“Nothing concrete so far has been accomplished on that issue,” Kluger said, speaking about the administration’s involvement in academic life in general.

Still, GUSA insiders say Angert and Kluger have accomplished more than their predecessors, Patrick Dowd (SFS ’09) and James Kelly (COL ’09).

“GUSA as a whole is on track to improve over last year and get things done for students,” GUSA Senator Nick Troiano (COL ’11) said.

“It seems like [Angert] and [Kluger] are more passionate about their work,” Solis said. “They are more invested, and by that I mean they are throwing everything they have into it.”

“[Dowd] did do good things, but he was less willing to work with other people who didn’t agree with him,” Solis said, citing what he called last year’s “SCU debacle.”

Last October, Dowd vetoed a bill to reauthorize SCU as a GUSA commission because SCU wanted to appoint a non-senator as its chair. The senate and Dowd eventually reached a compromise that allowed SCU to continue to operate as a GUSA entity, but in February, after the senate altered and rejected some recommendations made in the SCU’s final report, SCU cut its ties to GUSA.

Although Lamb praised Angert and Kluger for their accomplishments so far, he said there are more issues to be addressed.

“Additional attention must be paid to issues of diversity, student space and student safety,” he said.

Angert and Kluger declined to speculate on whether they would consider running for a second term next year.

“Haven’t even considered it,” Angert said, “I think it’s a poor way to think, seeing as it should never factor into a decision. … We’re not going to let the thought of a second term corrupt our mindset.”

“We have to make sure that we do absolutely the best job right now,” Kluger said. “The amount of work we have and the amount of time it takes — you can’t even start to think about next semester.”

But Solis said whispers have been circulating about a possible re-election campaign.

“Speculation is that they will be running again,” he said. “I’ve heard from a lot of GUSA senators that they are planning running for re-election.”

Kluger said he is looking forward to continuing his work on important campus issues in the second half of his term.

“I’m excited,” he said. “It’s important to create and maintain a sense of urgency — that you’re not okay with the status quo. We’ve made improvements, but we need to build on that. We need to make sure everyone works hard, keeps focusing.”

Johnny Solis is a joke Johnny Solis is a joke
Oct 06 2009 at 11:44 a.m.

What a joke. Everyone knows he is trying to get elected GUSA president this year, so instead of getting involved to help the students this idiot decides to just bash from the outside. Typical GUSA tool. Angert and Kluger are actually getting stuff done, not just providing pithy remarks in a Hoya article. The only thing more pathetic is the fact that Johnny Solis could never get elected.

Matt Matt
Oct 06 2009 at 12:09 p.m.

I think it's somewhat poor form to use Johnny Solis as the only source for Dowd criticism. Talk to anyone involved with GUSA last year, and it's clear that Solis had a huge grudge against Dowd related to the SCU. Yet he gets five quotes in the article, while the only other 'GUSA Insider' profiled, Troiano, gets one, along with one from Lamb.

I think most students, and Senators, were on Dowd's side of the so-called 'SCU Debacle'.

Brian Brian
Oct 06 2009 at 1:38 p.m.

@Matt: You are wrong. First of all, Solis only got 4 quotes; one just happened to be broken into 2 consecutive 1-line paragraphs. Of those 4 quotes, only 1 is about Pat Dowd. There is also a quote from Troiano about Dowd. Of the quotes on Dowd, there is one from Troiano and one from Solis. Lamb's quote is not about Dowd.

gc gc
Oct 06 2009 at 6:45 p.m.

^ Because who got quoted more is what's really important in this article. Seriously.

Matt Matt
Oct 06 2009 at 7:28 p.m.

To GC:

In terms of the substance of criticism, yes. If you read an article on Obama that was largely sourced from the Republican majority leader (but not named as such), you might be pretty annoyed that you're not getting the full picture.

The article's negative quotes and sentiments are all from Solis -- who, as pointed out above, is not a neutral reference. And while it may be valuable to include his point of view, the author should've definitely branched out to many other so-called 'GUSA insiders' to see what the representative view was.

Alex Alex
Oct 07 2009 at 3:52 p.m.

effect change, not affect. I know I probably have better things to do than to play at being a copy editor, but come on folks...

Richie Richie
Oct 08 2009 at 4:15 a.m.

(full disclosure before some unnamed "HOYA" rips me apart: I am a friend of both the prez and vice prez though I was friends with other candidates in the election too)

I think the focus of discussion, instead a petty back and forth about the article's balance, should be what this article means for Georgetown students. As a Georgetown student who has been left skeptical in the past by GUSA's supposed claim of caring about the non-GUSA students, I am pretty happy to read that these guys are actually doing something. I think GUSA has always been more active and involved than the student body gives it credit for, but this article has tangible evidence that these guys are actually working and holding themselves accountable to their campaign promises. They're balancing their big plans pretty well, it seems. Hope they keep it up and if they do, I hope they run again. Two years of a GUSA executive that has as much action as it does promises would be a welcome relief from the recent years (though Dowd and Kelly did a couple things such as the summer fellows program). As far as the senate goes, I doubt I'd vote into the executive anyone who's been in the GUSA senate for more than a year.

Post New Comment

Comments which are spam, off-topic, abusive, use excessive foul language or promote hate or bias will be deleted.

Anonymous comments will be held for moderation. This may take some time, so we recommend you create a free account. If you want a small picture next to your comments, get a gravatar.

Already have an account? Then login.