Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Tenure Denial Incites Backlash

Hoya Staff Writer

Published: Friday, February 22, 2013

Updated: Sunday, February 24, 2013 14:02


Students, alumni and professors have banded together to petition Georgetown’s July decision to deny tenure to the School of Foreign Service’s assistant professor of Arab politics Samer Shehata.

Ebie DuPont (GRD ’06) created the petition, which she submitted to University President John J. DeGioia Feb. 11 with 255 signatures after learning of the university’s decision.  

DuPont, who is based in Cairo, found out about the decision when she was visiting Washington in January and spoke to Shehata, who told her he was leaving Georgetown after being denied tenure in July and then unsuccessfully appealing the committee’s decision in September, learning of his second denial in November.

“He was denied tenure. People were shocked,” DuPont said. “He appealed it and had full support from the faculty.”

Several faculty members from the Center for Contemporary Arab Studies lent their support to Shehata’s appeal. Former CCAS Director Michael Hudson wrote a personal letter in response to Shehata’s denial.

Associate professor of Middle Eastern and Islamic studies at New York University Arang Keshavarzian said he was upset by the committee’s decision to deny Shehata tenure.

“I was also saddened for my own field of Middle East politics that doesn’t support the type of original, refined research exhibited in Samer’s publication,” Keshavarzian said. “His scholarly work, in terms of his political engagements and his willingness to dialogue with journalists is admirable. Samer strove to offer a deep understanding of Egyptian politics to as broad an audience as possible. He has gone a long way in achieving this objective.”

 “Denying Samer Shehata tenure is unjust and wrongheaded,” DuPont said. “It is an unbelievable judgment when you consider his record, which is superior on several levels to many other successful applicants in recent years.”

Among other accomplishments, Shehata was instrumental in establishing the Qatar Arabic Scholarship Program and the Qatar Postdoctoral Fellowship Program at CCAS.

“Together, both programs have brought hundreds of thousands of dollars to Georgetown and have created countless opportunities for students to critically engage with the Arab world,” Shehata said of his work.

Keshavarzian added that Shehata’s research was particularly significant in the wake of the Arab Spring.

In addition, Shehata emphasized his scholarly accomplishments outside of Georgetown.

“Because of my scholarship and expertise, I have frequently been asked to share my knowledge with senior U.S. government, World Bank and [International Monetary Fund] officials; civil society leaders, the policy community and the media,” Shehata said.

The petition stresses that Shehata’s work focuses on the contemporary Arab world, which is an explicit goal of CCAS in seeking to differentiate itself from other Middle East Studies programs.

DuPont pointed to Shehata’s proven excellence in teaching evaluations and student responses to his courses. According to DuPont, Shehata received an evaluation of 4.8 out of 5.0 in the ‘overall evaluation of instructor’ category for both “Egypt: Authoritarianism to Revolution” and “Contemporary Politics of the Middle East” in fall 2012.

“This was his score despite the stresses he has been going through for the last six months, having been rejected for tenure after more than a decade of service to the university and its students,” DuPont said.

Laci Barrow (GRD ’12) praised Shehata’s teaching and work.

“He has fantastic balance of scholarly, pedagogic and outreach,” she said. “His activities are so well balanced and in each of his activities he is so present and really engaging that its hard to find someone that has the combination of people skills and also teaching skills, pedagogic skills and who can also be representative of the university and can articulate political issues that the public can grasp.”

DuPont added that it is impossible to speculate on the reasons for the university’s denial because of the opacity of the tenure decision process.

“From my perspective, I can’t imagine the reason to deny him tenure. These decisions are not transparent.”

Graham Griffiths (GRD ’13) said losing Shehata will negatively impact the CCAS, which has been in a transition period.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

Anonymous
Tue Mar 19 2013 00:10
It's amazing how ignorant the general public is about what constitutes tenure at a top university.
being on TV, newspapers, comedy shows, etc does not make you a scholar.
Georgetown, as one of the top universities in the world, has high scholarly standards.
For someone who spent 12 yrs as an assistant professor, I have never seen such a poor publication record. By now he should have a Cambridge U Press book, a Yale book, and 4-5 top journal articles. SUNY and Routledge are not on the level Gtown needs.
I can't believe people actually question this denial. I have never met this person, but the poor publishing record speaks for itself. He squandered the opportunity to publish at top venues despite having the resources of places like Gtown, Columbia, and NYU.
Undergrads: don't second-guess professors who know the tenure system.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 19 2013 00:00
BTW, there is no "publication argument."

tenure depends on publishing at the very best university presses or top journals.

There is no other 'argument' for tenure.

He had none. He is not a scholar but more of a think-tank or commentator type.

This a no-brainer case for anyone who is tenured at a top-25 poli sci dept.

SUNY book and Routledge edited volume are very, very weak for 12 yrs as an assistant professor.

I am sure he'll find some good job at a policy place in DC.

Hadia Mubarak, MAAS '05
Thu Feb 28 2013 14:01
The loss of Dr. Shamer Shehata is the most tragic occurrence in the history of the Center for Contemporary Arab Studies at Georgetown, of which I am a proud alumnus ( MAAS '05). There can be no justification for this decision on any reasonable grounds. In fact, SFS's decision to deny Dr. Shehata a much-deserved tenure sets a dangerous precedent of allowing committees to make decisions based on arbitrary and non-academic reasons. The committee's repeated insistence that the "reason is confidential" further reflects that there is no substantial reason to support this decision; else, the committee would have disclosed its reasons.

I have taken two classes with Dr. Shehata in the past and they have been some of the most intellectually-stimulating, thought-provoking and informative classes I have ever taken. His analytical rigor, field research, methodical thoroughness and precision combined with his warmth and humility as a person make him a professor of the highest caliber one could strive to achieve.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 28 2013 08:02
As a current CCAS student, I totally agree with this article. With Dr. Shehata, our program is losing one of its most valuable scholars and teachers. And for politics concentrators (who have become more and more numerous) we now have no full faculty member to advise us and teach our core courses. This is unacceptable! Prof. Shehata is an incredibly helpful advisor and always responsive to students. His denial of tenure is our loss.
Matthew Anderson
Wed Feb 27 2013 22:11
I took a graduate seminar with Dr. Shehata on Islamist political movements, and was impressed with his knowledge of a complex field, and his balanced approach to controversial questions. He personally helped me to pursue my own interests, and went out of his way to graciously facilitate an interview for me with a significant personality in the Egyptian political scene. It is difficult to comprehend the rationale for Georgetown's decision, and I hope the university will reconsider.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 26 2013 00:07
Most likely, he offended one of the sheikhs/Middle East oil barons who Georgetown (particularly CCAS) pimps itself out to for millions in donations.
Hania L, COL '06
Sun Feb 24 2013 00:07
I can say Prof. Shehata's class was one of the most memorable CCAS courses I took as an undergrad. Please reconsider his tenure.
SFS '12
Sat Feb 23 2013 14:38
Professor Shehata was one of the best professors I had in Georgetown. His class changed the way I analyze current events. He also made it very easy to keep in touch with him after our course ended-- despite his busy schedule he always had time to explain the most recent events happening in Egypt to me. DeGioia must reconsider his decision.
Timothy Kaldas
Sat Feb 23 2013 04:47
The only justification for denying Dr. Shehata tenure would be the university's commitment to maintaining a system of tenure retirements that seeks to solidify the wall separating the academy from society as a whole. Anyone who attends one of Dr. Shehata's classes will immediately recognize him to be a talented and sophisticated scholar who is committed to engaging constantly in exhaustive research on topics that are relevant to the world we live in. I have studied at 3 of the top ranked universities in the world for international politics and I can honestly say without any hesitation that Dr. Shehata was one of the finest and most stimulating instructors I've ever had. I am continually impressed by his ability to maintain such an exceptional level of instruction while being so actively engaged in research in the field in the Middle East. Georgetown's decision to deny tenure to one of it's most promising scholars was clearly a mistake and it is a mistake in need of reversal. I remember how difficult it was during my time at MAAS to find stability in terms of the politics track and its faculty. Dr. Shehata's presence was invaluable to us in that regard. I sincerely hope the university will reverse its decision and welcome Dr. Shehata into its tenured faculty. There is no doubt that that is his rightful place.
Ebie duPont
Sat Feb 23 2013 02:44
I have heard the publication argument. The only problem is that Samer Shehata 's research and publication dossier was equal or superior to several other successful applicants in recent years. If you factor this together with his outstanding teaching record and service to the university which are the other two criteria considered for tenure, then this decision does not make sense at all. I agree that written contributions to non-peer reviewed journals should be considered. Through Dr. Shehata's many to other publications he has reached a wider audience and brought positive attention to Georgetown University and the Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.
Anonymous
Sat Feb 23 2013 00:49
was sorry to hear Samer Shehata was denied tenure. He is a smart, insightful, knowldgeable person. The reason I suspect is that it was thought that he did not publish a sufficient number of articles in peer reviewed journals. He has published one single author book (quite an original, valuable work), edited another book on a timely subject, and has quite a few articles and op-eds in major newspapers, policy magazines, area studies magazines, on-line news magazines and newsletters, encyclopedia entries, etc. He has also given many interviews on TV, but not published many articles in peer reviewed professional journals. The conclusions that can be drawn from this case are: 1. Op-eds, on-line magazines and journals, policy magazines, etc. should be given some weights in tenure decisions as they have a greater influence on policy than do professional peer-reviewed journals (which are mainly read by a small number of academics) and as communications technology is evloving creating new channels of information delivery. 2. Young professors should be told clearly from the beginning what is expected of them in order to obtain tenure, and they should receive feedback mid-way through their tenure clock as how they are doing. This is especially important in the case of SFS, which has a multi-disciplinary faculty, and where it is not always clear what the requirements for tenure are. There must be someone to advise and mentor young SFS faculty. Who would that be? Dr. Reardon-Anderson the Senior Associate Dean in charge of faculty affairs? Dean Lancaster should look into this problem as not to lose more promissing faculty. I hope the decision on Dr.Shehata can still be reversed.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 22 2013 12:46
This decision does additional damage to CCAS, which has already earned a reputation for being a very un-collegial and unsupportive department. I personally know a handful of scholars who turned down offers (or avoided submitting applications altogether) due to the widespread perception that faculty working for CCAS are paid uncompetitive salaries and advised to supplement their income by securing non-resident fellowships and contract work with DC area think tanks and research centers. This necessitates a fairly high public profile, which itself requires scholars to make frequent media appearances, accept any workshop or panel invitations that come their way, and generally spend a huge chunk of their time doing work unrelated to teaching or their own scholarship. Samer was ubiquitous on local and international media - and became a well-recognized expert on regional politics who was respected by both his colleagues and the DC political establishment (no mean achievement). And after spending 10 years adhering to this dual scholar-commentator career track imposed by the Georgetown University administration....he's denied tenure? I think I speak for all my colleagues when I express advance condolences for whomever is unlucky enough to be hired to fill Samer's post
Alum
Fri Feb 22 2013 11:04
This is ridiculous! Professor Shehata was a remarkable professor and I learned a ton from his class.




log out