Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

GUSA Debate Tweet Fuels Controversy

Executive's Role in Campaign Questioned

Hoya Staff Writer

Published: Monday, February 18, 2013

Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 01:02

A tweet from the official Georgetown University Student Association Twitter account fueled controversy during tonight’s GUSA debate regarding the GUSA executive’s support for the Appelbaum and Cleary ticket.

After the presidential candidates responded to a question of which ticket they would support second to their own, the official GUSA account tweeted, “We’re honored to have the support of Shavonnia and Joe who say they’d put as #2 on their ballot! #GUSAssociation [sic].”

The tweet, which was deleted minutes later, was seen by some as a reflection of a gray area between individual members' support for Jack Appelbaum (COL ’14) and Maggie Cleary (COL ’14) and the institution’s as a whole. The tweet was written by Mike Madoff (SFS ’13), who is communications director for the GUSA executive and a campaign staffer for Appelbaum and Cleary.

Madoff was tweeting from both the GUSA account and the Appelbaum and Cleary campaign account during the debate and said the tweet in question was not done intentionally. The GUSA account later tweeted, “We apologize for the earlier technical issue.”

Current GUSA President Clara Gustafson (SFS ’13) and Vice President Vail Kohnert-Yount have been vocal supporters of the Appelbaum and Cleary ticket, as has their chief of staff, Jake Sticka (SFS ’13), who is managing the ticket’s campaign.

“I think it’s unfortunate,” Sticka said of the tweet after the debate. While he noted that 13 members of the executive have come out in support of Appelbaum and Cleary, he added, “I don’t think it’s fair to say that GUSA as an institution has taken a side in this election.”

Other GUSA candidates saw it differently, including Spencer Walsh (MSB ’14), who said the tweet is reflective of the relationship between the executive and the Appelbaum ticket.

“Jack and Maggie are obviously great candidates, but the executive has been pushed to support a ticket, and I think that is inappropriate,” Walsh said, citing Sticka’s involvement in GUSA and the campaign. “If that tweet doesn’t show the connection between the two, I really don’t know what does.”

Adam Ramadan (SFS ’14), who is running for vice president alongside GUSA senate Speaker Nate Tisa (SFS ’14), confronted Sticka after the debate about the appropriateness of the tweet. His running mate said he shared this concern.

“As senate speaker who has access to GUSA’s Twitter, Facebook and Hoyalink accounts, I have never once used them for our campaign,” Tisa said. Although Tisa said he did not believe the tweet was intentional, he added, “I think there was a reason why Mike and Greg did not endorse a candidate last year,” a reference the previous GUSA president and vice president, respectively.

Ethan Chess (SFS ’14), chair of the GUSA election committee and moderator of the debate, explained that GUSA rules prohibit a candidate from using university resources for their campaign. He would not comment on whether a sanction would be issued if a formal complaint were raised.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

25 comments

Anonymous
Thu Feb 21 2013 14:31
There is no such thing as a GUSA student list serve. Emails from GUSA are sent out using the University's broadcast email system and are all pre-approved by Erika Cohen-Derr.
Anonymous
Wed Feb 20 2013 18:55
"'As senate speaker who has access to GUSA's Twitter, Facebook and Hoyalink accounts, I have never once used them for our campaign,' Tisa said." I know for a fact that Nate Tisa used GUSA's student listserv in last year's election.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 19 2013 22:32
So you are saying "Not as brave as Clara and Jake" is your real name? Doubtful, hypocrite.
Not as brave as Clara and Jake
Tue Feb 19 2013 10:46
Clara and Jake are the only one's with the guts to put their names on what they say, so I'm going to take their word over the faceless claims of those invariably involved in opposing campaigns.
@GUSA Alum
Tue Feb 19 2013 10:45
No one believes you're an alum.
Bubba
Tue Feb 19 2013 09:26
What's twttier? I ran for GUSA, and didn't win.

Look at me now?!

HRC
Tue Feb 19 2013 08:36
Barack, I thought we discussed this. You said you were supporting me?
Barack Obama
Tue Feb 19 2013 08:26
What do you mean old Executives can't help new ones get elected? Joe Biden is BFD, and I am going to help him win.
Bob Marley
Tue Feb 19 2013 08:25
Everyone just needs to chill out man.
Member of GUSA
Tue Feb 19 2013 05:06
I don't even know what Jake is referring to in regards to rule-breaking. Please don't involve GUSA into this, his views are reflective of his involvement on the Jack and Maggie campaign not GUSA.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 19 2013 02:49
Well, well. I think if Sticka is going to throw around unfounded allegations, he should give us some facts to back them up.
Hopefully Rational
Tue Feb 19 2013 02:40
I don't think the question is about the election commission at all...I see no reason to believe any bias and frankly don't think anyone does. To me, the question is whether it's fair for GUSA to be so involved in its own succession. GUSA has a disproportionate voice in this election simply because it has the most visibility, not necessarily because it's the most authoritative on student issues (eg. cultural groups would clearly be more authoritative on diversity, but you don't see much attention on them). I think that if a candidate is qualified and knowledgable on student-university procedure, that he/she should explain this knowledge independently of GUSA executives doing so for him/her.
GUSA Alum
Tue Feb 19 2013 02:37
I think there needs to be a rethinking of how exactly members of one administration can and do provide support to different tickets in the Presidential campaign. It doesn't really seem feasible to say that members of the administration or even the entire administration cannot endorse and even actively support a particular ticket. But there should be some kind of clear firewalling between when someone is working as part of the current administration and when they are campaigning. So when Mike was tweeting on behalf of GUSA, he should not have also been tweeting on behalf of Jack and Maggie's campaign. Especially given some of the rules surrounding what resources a campaign may or may not use, this kind of firewalling is even more important. And frankly, when mistakes happen, GUSA shouldn't be disingenuous and suggest that it was a "technical difficulty". It was a human error brought about by an inappropriate mixing of roles during the debate. I don't think it was done intentionally, but it does suggest that mixing roles between the administration and campaigning should be done more carefully. Also, certain resources, like the GUSA twitter, should not even be used for campaigning purposes. Just a cursory look over the twitter shows that the personal views of different administration members are often retweeted, which suggests that GUSA endorses those views. Even if the entire administration supported one particular ticket (which is not the case here), using the twitter to retweet statements of support or opposition to certain tickets crosses the line to violating the rule surrounding the election. Members of the administration can use their personal resources within the scope of the rules to promote whatever they want. They should not be able to abuse their access to university resources to promote certain candidates.
Undecided
Tue Feb 19 2013 02:15
@Jake, I'd say I'm pretty undecided. I'm debating between Shavonnia, Nate, Spencer and Cannon at this point. Jake, could you please elaborate on how any of the candidates have broken the rules? I'm sure I speak for many students who would be interested in hearing about any more ethics violations.
Jake Sticka
Tue Feb 19 2013 01:51
@Undecided: I have been using great restraint to not post in this thread and as you saw, Clara uses her own name when posting. I don't know if Nate voting for them is relevant, but if you really are questioning the impartiality of the Election Commission, then I suspect you're not as undecided as you claim to be. If anything, the EC has been lenient on the Tisa/Ramadan campaign given their explicit instructions to their campaign staffers to break the rules.
Undecided
Tue Feb 19 2013 01:43
Dear Clara/Jake, I am quite serious. Why are you bringing up the fact that Nate voted "yes" for the members of the Election Commission? I voted for Clara and Vail last year. That doesn't mean I trust their judgements now. In fact, why are you bringing up Nate at all? This isn't about Nate or Spencer or Shavonnia. This is about Jack and the professionalism/ethics of his campaign.
Clara Gustafson
Tue Feb 19 2013 01:22
This is the last, and only the second, comment from the real Clara Gustafson. Please do not use my name if you are not me. Once again- do not speak for other people.

To "Undecided" the GUSA Election Commission is 3 students who have never been in GUSA before. Please go to https://gusa.georgetown.edu/?page_id=322 to find out more.

@More Transparency
Tue Feb 19 2013 01:20
Define corrupt, please.
@Undecided
Tue Feb 19 2013 01:18
Seriously? Are you kidding me?

I'll remind you that the Election Commission is the group that runs the actual election and counts the votes. All three current members of the Election Commission were currently appointed by past Executives and CONFIRMED by past Senates. Oh and I will note, Nate Tisa was a member of and voted "Yes" to confirm each member of the Election Commission. That point right there should end any question of this "free and fair" dispute.

More Transparency
Tue Feb 19 2013 01:15
In response to Clara's comment, I think it's okay to tear down an institution as long as it is one that is broken and corrupt. The fact that Mike Madoff was quite literally behind one computer controlling the accounts of both Jack and GUSA shows how corrupt and influential the current exec board has become. In this case, tearing down GUSA and the people it supports is a step in the right direction to repairing an administrative board so crucial to Georgetown's success.




log out